Disability UK Online Health Journal - All In One Business In A Box - Forum - Business Directory - Useful Resources

Category: Marginalization

The Misconception of Choice in Disability Isolation

Brown and Cream Image Of a Typewriter With The Wording Disability Discrimination  Text On Typed On Typewriter Paper. Image Credit: PhotoFunia.com Category Vintage Typewriter
Brown and Cream Image Of A Typewriter With The Wording ‘Disability Discrimination’ On Typed On Typewriter Paper. Image Credit: PhotoFunia.com Category Vintage Typewriter


Choosing To Stay At Home Is Not A Luxury

In contemporary society, there persists a significant misunderstanding regarding the lives of disabled individuals, particularly those who experience isolation. This misconception often manifests in the assumption that their isolation is a matter of personal choice rather than a consequence of their disability. This erroneous belief not only overlooks the daily struggles faced by disabled individuals but also perpetuates a harmful cycle of discrimination and ableism.

Disabilities That Can Lead to Isolation (This is not a definitive list as there are too many to mention)

  1. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): Reason: Fear of contamination or intrusive thoughts making social interactions overwhelming.
  2. Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): Reason: Chronic pain and mobility issues make it difficult to engage in physical activities.
  3. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Reason: Sensory sensitivities and difficulties with social communication leading to overwhelming situations in public.
  4. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS): Reason: Severe fatigue makes it challenging to participate in social and physical activities.
  5. Social Anxiety Disorder: Reason: Intense fear of social situations leading to avoidance of interactions.
  6. Agoraphobia: Reason: Fear of places or situations where escape might be difficult, leading to avoidance of public places.
  7. Major Depressive Disorder: Reason: Persistent sadness and lack of energy making social activities unappealing.
  8. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Reason: Flashbacks and heightened anxiety triggered by certain social environments.
  9. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): Reason: Excessive worry about various aspects of life causing avoidance of social interactions.
  10. Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Reason: Fatigue and mobility issues making it difficult to leave the house.
  11. Fibromyalgia: Reason: Widespread pain and fatigue leading to avoidance of physical activities.
  12. Bipolar Disorder: Reason: Mood swings and episodes of depression or mania make consistent social engagement difficult.
  13. Schizophrenia: Reason: Delusions and hallucinations causing mistrust or fear of social interactions.
  14. Severe Asthma: Reason: Fear of triggering an asthma attack in certain environments.
  15. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Reason: Difficulty breathing making physical exertion and social activities challenging.
  16. Severe Allergies: Reason: Risk of severe allergic reactions in various environments.
  17. Lyme Disease: Reason: Chronic symptoms such as fatigue and pain making social activities exhausting.
  18. Parkinson’s Disease: Reason: Mobility issues and tremors make it difficult to navigate public spaces.
  19. Crohn’s Disease: Reason: Frequent and urgent need for restrooms making it challenging to be in public places.
  20. Lupus: Reason: Fatigue and joint pain leading to reduced social engagement.
  21. Epilepsy: Reason: Fear of having a seizure in public.
  22. Migraines: Reason: Severe headache and light sensitivity making social environments unbearable.
  23. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: Reason: Chronic fatigue and cognitive issues make it difficult to engage socially.
  24. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: Reason: Joint pain and instability making physical activities challenging.
  25. Endometriosis: Reason: Severe pain and fatigue affecting daily activities.
  26. Huntington’s Disease: Reason: Cognitive decline and motor impairment leading to difficulty in social settings.
  27. Sickle Cell Disease: Reason: Pain crises and fatigue limiting social participation.
  28. Chronic Pain Syndrome: Reason: Persistent pain makes it hard to engage in social activities.
  29. Spinal Cord Injuries: Reason: Mobility limitations and potential lack of accessibility in public places.
  30. Severe Vision or Hearing Loss: Reason: Communication barriers and difficulty navigating public spaces.
  31. Alzheimer’s Disease: Reason: Cognitive decline leads to confusion and difficulty navigating social situations.
  32. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): Reason: Progressive muscle weakness and paralysis making mobility and communication challenging.
  33. Cerebral Palsy: Reason: Motor impairments and potential communication difficulties limiting social interactions.
  34. Chronic Kidney Disease: Reason: Fatigue and frequent dialysis treatments restricting social activities.
  35. Cystic Fibrosis: Reason: Frequent respiratory infections and fatigue make it difficult to engage socially.
  36. Down Syndrome: Reason: Cognitive and physical challenges potentially leading to social isolation, especially in non-inclusive environments.
  37. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Reason: Progressive muscle degeneration and weakness limiting physical activity.
  38. Heart Disease: Reason: Fatigue and physical limitations make social and physical activities difficult.
  39. Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder: Reason: Joint pain and instability leading to avoidance of physical activities.
  40. Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): Reason: Frequent and urgent need for restrooms and chronic pain limiting social engagement.
  41. Interstitial Cystitis: Reason: Chronic pelvic pain and frequent urination making it difficult to participate in social activities.
  42. Marfan Syndrome: Reason: Cardiovascular and skeletal issues causing physical limitations and fatigue.
  43. Meniere’s Disease: Reason: Vertigo and balance issues make social situations challenging.
  44. Motor Neurone Disease (MND): Reason: Progressive muscle weakness and paralysis affecting mobility and communication.
  45. Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS): Reason: Severe reactions to common chemicals and pollutants lead to avoidance of many public places.
  46. Myasthenia Gravis: Reason: Muscle weakness and fatigue affecting physical and social activities.
  47. Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Reason: Brittle bones and frequent fractures limiting physical activity.
  48. Peripheral Neuropathy: Reason: Pain, numbness, and weakness in extremities making physical activities difficult.
  49. Polymyalgia Rheumatica: Reason: Severe muscle pain and stiffness limiting mobility.
  50. Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS): Reason: Dizziness, fatigue, and fainting upon standing making it difficult to engage in social activities.
  51. Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD): Reason: Chronic pain and sensitivity to touch make physical and social activities uncomfortable.
  52. Sjogren’s Syndrome: Reason: Fatigue and dryness affecting overall well-being and social engagement.
  53. Spina Bifida: Reason: Mobility issues and the potential need for assistive devices limiting social activities.
  54. Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Reason: Progressive muscle weakness and atrophy affecting mobility and social interaction.
  55. Stroke: Reason: Physical and cognitive impairments post-stroke limiting social and physical activities.
  56. Systemic Sclerosis: Reason: Skin and internal organ involvement causing pain and fatigue.
  57. Tardive Dyskinesia: Reason: Involuntary movements make social interactions challenging.
  58. Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (TMJ): Reason: Chronic jaw pain and headaches make social and physical activities uncomfortable.
  59. Tinnitus: Reason: Persistent ringing in the ears causing distress and difficulty concentrating in social settings.
  60. Tourette Syndrome: Reason: Involuntary tics leading to social discomfort and potential stigma.
  61. Type 1 Diabetes: Reason: Need for constant monitoring and management of blood sugar levels leading to social and activity restrictions.
  62. Severe Eczema: Reason: Painful and visible skin conditions causing discomfort and social anxiety.
  63. Psoriasis: Reason: Visible skin lesions leading to social discomfort and stigma.
  64. Schizoaffective Disorder: Reason: Combination of schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms leading to social isolation.
  65. Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID): Reason: Complex and variable symptoms make social interactions challenging.

These conditions can significantly impact individuals’ abilities to engage in social activities and everyday tasks, often leading them to isolate not by choice but by necessity. Understanding and acknowledging these challenges is crucial in promoting a more inclusive and supportive society.

Fear of Human Interaction in OCD

The Editor who suffers from OCD states she finds it difficult to interact in the physical realm. Individuals with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) may experience a debilitating fear of human interaction. OCD is characterized by intrusive thoughts and repetitive behaviors that can severely impact one’s ability to engage in social activities. The fear of contamination, social judgment, or other triggers can lead individuals with OCD to avoid interactions that most people take for granted. This avoidance is not a voluntary choice but a coping mechanism to manage overwhelming anxiety and distress.

Pain and Mobility Issues in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Similarly, those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may find it difficult to leave their homes, not out of choice, but due to chronic pain and reduced mobility. RA is an autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and damage to the joints, leading to significant discomfort and physical limitations. For some, even simple activities such as walking or driving can be excruciating. The decision not to undergo surgery, despite the potential for pain relief, may be driven by practical considerations. Disabled entrepreneurs, for instance, may avoid surgery because the recovery period could disrupt their business operations, which depend on their constant involvement.

The Reality of 24/7 Jobs

Certain professions demand continuous availability, further complicating the lives of disabled individuals. Jobs such as website designers, IT support specialists, and certain medical professionals require round-the-clock readiness to address emergencies or critical issues. These roles often involve:

  • Website Designers: Must be available to fix crashes or implement urgent updates to ensure that websites remain operational and secure.
  • IT Support Specialists: Provide critical support to businesses and individuals, resolving technical issues that can arise at any time.
  • Doctors or Nurses on Call: Respond to medical emergencies, providing essential care when needed most.

For disabled individuals in these roles, the challenges are compounded by the need to manage their health conditions while maintaining professional responsibilities. This necessity can lead to further isolation as they struggle to balance work demands with their health needs.

Legal Implications of Misunderstanding Disability

The assumption that isolation is a choice rather than a disability has serious legal and ethical implications. When individuals or organizations view a disability through this erroneous lens, they engage in discrimination and ableism. Ableism, the discrimination and social prejudice against people with disabilities manifests in various forms, including:

  • Workplace Discrimination: Employers may unfairly judge disabled employees as unmotivated or unwilling to participate fully, leading to biased decisions in hiring, promotions, and accommodations.
  • Social Exclusion: Friends and family might misinterpret a disabled person’s reluctance to socialize as a lack of interest, rather than understanding the underlying health issues.
  • Legal Consequences: Discrimination against disabled individuals can lead to legal repercussions under laws such as the Equality Of Human Rights Commission (EHRC) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The mandates are reasonable accommodations for disabled individuals in the workplace and other areas of public life. Failure to provide such accommodations or discriminating against someone based on their disability status can result in lawsuits, fines, and other legal actions.

A Case Study in Misunderstanding

Consider John, a small business owner with severe rheumatoid arthritis. Despite his success, John’s condition makes it difficult for him to engage in social activities or attend networking events. A colleague, unaware of John’s condition, assumes that John’s absence from these events is due to a lack of interest or commitment. This assumption leads the colleague to spread rumors about John’s dedication to his business.

As a result, John faces social ostracization and a decline in professional opportunities. When he learns of the rumors, John decides to confront the colleague, explaining his condition and the true reasons for his absence. The colleague’s response, however, is dismissive, reflecting a deep-seated prejudice against disabilities. John is forced to take legal action, citing discrimination and a hostile work environment.

This scenario highlights the pervasive issue of ableism and the importance of educating society about the realities of living with a disability. It is crucial to recognize that isolation and other behaviors commonly attributed to personal choice are often rooted in the challenges posed by disabilities. By fostering understanding and compassion, we can create a more inclusive society that respects and supports individuals with disabilities.

Conclusion

Individuals with disabilities often do not have the luxury of choice when it comes to staying at home. Their decision to remain isolated is frequently a necessity driven by the constraints of their condition, rather than a lack of desire for social interaction or participation in daily activities. Assuming that a disabled person stays at home and does nothing all day is a form of discrimination known as ableism. This prejudice marginalizes people with disabilities, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and further isolating them from society. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential in creating an inclusive environment where everyone, regardless of their physical or mental abilities, can live with dignity and respect. By fostering greater understanding and empathy, we can dismantle the barriers that discriminate against and marginalize those with disabilities.

Further Reading:


Disabled Entrepreneur Business Card.

DWP Treating People Like Criminals

PIP Eligibility Text on Typewriter Paper. Image Credit: PhotoFunia.com
A brown and cream image of the wording “PIP Eligibility” text typed on typewriter paper on a typewriter


DWP Treating People Like Criminals For Having PIP Reinstated

In legal contexts, implying that someone is not telling the truth can involve a variety of terms and concepts beyond the straightforward accusation of “lying.” These terms encompass a range of behaviors and implications, each with specific legal connotations and consequences.

When someone with an incurable illness or disability is subjected to a review by the DWP for their PIP award, it can be perceived as a form of discrimination and may be classed as ableism or indirect discrimination.

Ableism refers to discrimination and social prejudice against people with disabilities, rooted in the belief that typical abilities are superior. Indirect discrimination occurs when a seemingly neutral policy disproportionately affects individuals with disabilities. These reviews, particularly for those with lifelong conditions, can reflect underlying biases that question the legitimacy of their disabilities and impose unnecessary stress and bureaucratic burdens, reinforcing the societal marginalization and stigmatization of disabled individuals.

Scrutiny of DWP’s PIP Review Process for Incurable Illnesses: Legal and Ethical Implications

When the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) reviews a Personal Independence Payment (PIP) award for someone with an incurable illness or disability, it raises significant ethical and legal concerns. Despite having comprehensive medical evidence that confirms the permanence and severity of a claimant’s condition, the DWP’s continued scrutiny can be perceived as a form of discrimination, potentially classifiable as ableism or indirect discrimination.

Legal Implications of Persistent Reviews

Discrimination and Ableism

Ableism involves discrimination and social prejudice against individuals with disabilities. It manifests in policies and practices that assume people without disabilities are more capable and deserving of fair treatment. Persistent reviews of individuals with incurable conditions, despite clear medical evidence, can imply that their word or the word of their medical professionals is not trusted. This undermines their lived experiences and abilities, reinforcing ableist attitudes.

Indirect discrimination occurs when a seemingly neutral policy or practice disproportionately disadvantages people with disabilities. Regular reviews of those with permanent disabilities could be seen as such, as these policies do not account for the immutable nature of their conditions, placing undue stress and bureaucratic burdens on individuals who should otherwise be receiving stable support.

The DWP’s Response and Terminology

In their correspondence, the DWP often uses carefully crafted language that can add to the stress and uncertainty experienced by claimants. A typical PIP award letter might include statements such as:

“We have the right to take back any money we pay that you are not entitled to. This may be because of the way the payment system works. For example, you may give us some information, which means you are entitled to less money. Sometimes we may not be able to change the amount we have already paid you. This means we will have paid you money that you are not entitled to. We will contact you before we take back any money. We need to know if your condition, the amount of help you need, or your circumstances change. This is because it may change how much Personal Independence Payment you can get.

PIP Award Letter

The Purpose and Impact of This Terminology

The DWP’s use of such terminology is intended to inform claimants about their responsibilities and the conditions under which their payments might be adjusted. However, for individuals with permanent and incurable conditions, this language can be particularly distressing and discriminating. It implies that the claimant could be at fault for overpayments, which may not be relevant given the unchanging nature of their disability. This can make claimants feel criminalized and under suspicion, despite their transparent and documented medical conditions.

Potential Legal and Ethical Violations

  1. Harassment and Intimidation: Repeated and unnecessary reviews, coupled with the threatening language regarding the recovery of overpayments, can be construed as a form of harassment. This can create a hostile environment for claimants, contributing to mental distress and a feeling of being unjustly targeted.
  2. Breach of Trust: By continuing to question the legitimacy of a claimant’s condition, the DWP risks breaching the trust that should exist between a government body and the individuals it serves. This can erode confidence in the social security system.
  3. Violation of Human Rights: Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to respect for private and family life. Persistent reviews of a claimant’s incurable condition could be argued to violate this right by causing unnecessary interference in their lives.

What Claimants Can Do

Challenge the Review Process

Claimants can challenge the review process by:

  • Filing a formal complaint: Outlining the unnecessary stress and providing evidence of their incurable condition.
  • Seeking support from advocacy groups: Organizations like Citizens Advice can provide guidance and support.
  • Consulting legal advice: A solicitor specializing in disability rights can offer tailored advice and potential legal recourse.

Document All Interactions

Keep detailed records of all communications with the DWP, including copies of letters, emails, and notes from phone calls. This documentation can be crucial if a formal complaint or legal action becomes necessary.

Engage with Medical Professionals

Continuously update and provide the DWP with medical evidence that supports the permanence of the condition. Clear and consistent medical documentation can strengthen the case against unnecessary reviews.

Legal Terminology for Implying Falsehoods Beyond “Lying”. If someone suggests or implies you are not telling the truth what are they guilty of?

When someone suggests or implies that you are not telling the truth, they are not necessarily guilty of any specific legal offense. However, their actions might fall into one of the following categories:

Defamation: If the suggestion or implication is made publicly and harms your reputation, it could be considered defamation. Defamation includes both slander (spoken false statements) and libel (written false statements). To prove defamation, you would need to show that the statement was false, damaging, and made with malicious intent.

False Accusation: If the suggestion is more direct and accuses you of a specific wrongdoing, it might be considered a false accusation. False accusations can have serious consequences, especially if they lead to legal proceedings or damage your reputation.

Bad Faith: While not a legal term per se, accusing someone of lying without evidence or in bad faith can be harmful. It reflects poorly on the accuser’s integrity and may damage relationships or trust.

Here are some key terms:

1. Perjury

Perjury is a severe legal offense that occurs when an individual intentionally makes false statements under oath in a judicial proceeding. It is not merely lying but doing so in a context where the law requires the truth. Perjury is considered a serious crime because it undermines the integrity of the legal system. Perjury is the act of lying or giving deliberately misleading information while under oath. For example, during a trial or criminal proceeding, witnesses are sworn in and asked to be completely honest in their statements. If someone intentionally provides false information in such a situation, it constitutes perjury.

2. False Testimony

False testimony is similar to perjury but may not always rise to the same level of legal severity. It involves providing untrue statements in a legal context, such as in court or in sworn affidavits. While all perjury is false testimony, not all false testimony constitutes perjury, depending on the intent and circumstances.

3. Misrepresentation

Misrepresentation involves presenting false or misleading information. In legal terms, it often relates to contracts or transactions where one party provides incorrect details that the other party relies upon. Misrepresentation can be classified into three types: innocent, negligent, and fraudulent, with fraudulent misrepresentation being the most severe.

4. Fraud

Fraud is a broad legal term that encompasses intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain. It involves deliberate actions to mislead others, often for financial benefit. Fraud can occur in various contexts, including contracts, insurance claims, and financial transactions.

5. Defamation

Defamation involves making false statements about someone that harm their reputation. It can be classified into two types: libel (written defamation) and slander (spoken defamation). While defamation primarily concerns false statements about others, accusations of lying that are not true themselves can lead to defamation claims.

6. Deception

Deception is a general term used to describe the act of misleading or tricking someone. In legal contexts, deception can lead to charges of fraud, misrepresentation, or other forms of dishonest behavior. Deception often implies a calculated and intentional act to cause someone to believe something that is not true.

7. Concealment

Concealment involves hiding or withholding information that one is legally obliged to disclose. It is a form of dishonesty that can be just as damaging as lying, particularly in legal and contractual settings. Concealment can lead to charges of fraud or misrepresentation if it results in harm or loss to another party.

8. Breach of Trust

Breach of trust occurs when someone violates the trust placed in them, particularly in fiduciary relationships. This can include situations where a person entrusted with certain responsibilities or information acts dishonestly or fails to act in the best interest of the party to whom they owe a duty.

9. Mendacious:

While not exclusive to legal contexts, the term “mendacious” is more formal and objective than simply saying “lying.” It can be used to accuse someone of intentionally not telling the truth.

10. Prevaricate

This word means to avoid telling the truth or to be deliberately vague or evasive in order to mislead or deceive. When someone chooses their words carefully to avoid giving a direct answer, they might be prevaricating

Navigating Accusations of Dishonesty in DWP/PIP Reviews: Legal Terms and Remedies

This can be especially disheartening when you have had your PIP reinstated by a tribunal court, yet the DWP continues to question your eligibility.

Understanding the legal terms for such accusations and knowing your rights can help you navigate this challenging situation.

Legal Terminology for Accusations of Dishonesty

  1. Maladministration Maladministration refers to inefficient or improper management by a public body, such as the DWP. If the DWP handles your case in a way that is unfair, biased, or incorrect, this can constitute maladministration. This term covers a range of issues including delay, failure to follow procedures, and giving incorrect or misleading advice.
  2. Defamation Defamation involves making false statements that harm your reputation. While defamation typically refers to public statements, if the DWP’s communications or actions suggest dishonesty on your part without evidence, and this harms your reputation, you may have grounds to claim defamation.
  3. Harassment If the DWP’s actions are excessively persistent or aggressive, causing you distress, this could be considered harassment. Harassment involves unwanted behavior that intimidates, humiliates, or degrades a person.
  4. Unreasonable Conduct The term “unreasonable conduct” can be used to describe actions by the DWP that are unfair or not based on evidence. This includes unsubstantiated accusations or persistent questioning of your integrity without basis.

What You Can Do About It

1. File a Complaint

You have the right to file a formal complaint if you believe the DWP is treating you unfairly. Start by following the DWP’s complaints procedure. Clearly outline the issues, provide any evidence you have, and explain how their actions have affected you.

2. Involve an Ombudsman

If you are not satisfied with the DWP’s response to your complaint, you can escalate the matter to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about maladministration and can make recommendations to resolve the issue.

3. Seek Legal Advice

Consulting with a solicitor who specializes in welfare benefits can provide you with tailored advice. A solicitor can help you understand your rights, represent you in disputes, and potentially take legal action against the DWP for defamation, harassment, or unreasonable conduct.

4. Tribunal Decisions

If a tribunal court has reinstated your PIP indefinitely, this decision is legally binding. The DWP can review your case in the future, but they must have substantial grounds to change the tribunal’s decision. Keep copies of all tribunal decisions and medical evidence to support your case.

5. Document Everything

Maintain a detailed record of all interactions with the DWP, including letters, emails, phone calls, and notes from meetings. This documentation can be crucial if you need to challenge the DWP’s actions or decisions.

6. Use Medical Evidence

Continuously gather and update medical evidence to support your disability claim. This includes letters from doctors, medical reports, and any other relevant documentation. Presenting this evidence can strengthen your case and counter any accusations of dishonesty.

7. Support from Advocacy Groups

Various advocacy groups and charities provide support for individuals dealing with PIP claims. These organizations can offer advice, help with paperwork, and support you during appeals and reviews.

Addressing the 10-Year Review

If the tribunal court has stated that your PIP is indefinite but the DWP intends to review it in 10 years, this can be a point of contention (argument). The DWP is allowed to review cases periodically to ensure continued eligibility, but an indefinite award from a tribunal should be respected.

Steps to Take:

  1. Confirm the Tribunal Decision Ensure that you have a clear, written copy of the tribunal’s decision stating that your PIP is indefinite.
  2. Request Clarification Write to the DWP asking for clarification on why they are planning a review despite the tribunal’s indefinite award. Request a written response.
  3. Seek Legal Recourse If the DWP insists on a review without substantial grounds, seek legal advice. A solicitor can help you challenge the review process if it contradicts the tribunal’s decision.

Conclusion

Dealing with accusations of dishonesty from the DWP when managing your PIP claim can be distressing, but understanding the legal terms and your rights can empower you to take appropriate action. Whether it’s filing a complaint, seeking legal advice, or ensuring that a tribunal’s decision is respected, there are several steps you can take to protect yourself and ensure fair treatment. Always document your interactions, gather medical evidence, and don’t hesitate to seek support from advocacy groups to navigate this complex process.

In legal terms, implying that someone is not telling the truth can be expressed through various concepts depending on the context and severity of the behavior. Understanding these terms is crucial in navigating legal disputes and ensuring that accusations are appropriately addressed. Whether it is perjury, misrepresentation, or fraud, each term carries specific legal implications and potential consequences, reflecting the complexity of how the law views and handles dishonesty.

Remember that context matters, and the legal implications depend on the specific circumstances and jurisdiction. 🕵️‍♂️


Further Reading:


Disabled Entrepreneur Business Card.