Disability UK Online Health News Journal, Disability Business Directory, All-In-One Disability Business Solutions. Working in Partnership With Cymru Marketing Journal (CMJUK) & UK Website Designers

Category: Humiliation

Consequences Of Humiliating Someone In Public

The Ripple Effect of Public Humiliation: Consequences That Extend Beyond the Moment

Public humiliation is a potent force that can leave lasting scars, not just on the individual directly affected but also on the fabric of social dynamics. Where we are becoming increasingly interconnected through social media, the consequences of humiliating someone in public can extend far beyond the immediate moment, affecting mental health, relationships, and even societal well-being.

  1. Impact on Mental Health: Humiliating someone in public can have severe repercussions on their mental health. The shame and embarrassment experienced in such situations can lead to anxiety, depression, and a loss of self-esteem. The long-term effects may manifest in a heightened sense of vulnerability and reluctance to engage in social interactions, perpetuating a cycle of isolation and loneliness.
  2. Strained Relationships: Public humiliation often fractures relationships, both personal and professional. The bonds of trust can be irreparably damaged, leading to a breakdown in communication and understanding. Friends may distance themselves, colleagues may lose respect, and family dynamics may be forever altered. Rebuilding these relationships can be a challenging and lengthy process if it is even possible.
  3. Social Stigma: In the age of social media, public humiliation can become viral within seconds, amplifying its impact. The person subjected to humiliation may face a social stigma that follows them for a long time. This can affect various aspects of their life, including job opportunities, friendships, and romantic relationships. The permanence of online content can make it challenging to escape the shadow of public humiliation.
  4. Impact on bystanders: Witnessing public humiliation can create a culture of fear and silence. Bystanders may become reluctant to express themselves freely or challenge authority, fearing that they too could be the next target. This stifling of expression can have broader implications for societal progress, as diverse perspectives and constructive criticism are essential for growth and development.
  5. Legal Consequences: In extreme cases, public humiliation can lead to legal repercussions. Depending on the nature of the humiliation, it may be considered defamation, harassment, or even assault. Legal action can result in financial consequences and further damage to the reputations of both the perpetrator and the victim.

What should you do if you have been publicly humiliated by someone of authority?

Experiencing public humiliation, especially from someone in authority, can be incredibly distressing.

Here are some steps you can consider taking to navigate through such a challenging situation:

  1. Stay Calm: It’s natural to feel a surge of emotions when humiliated, but try to remain calm. Take deep breaths and give yourself a moment to process what happened.
  2. Find Support: Reach out to friends, family, or colleagues for emotional support. Sharing your feelings with someone you trust can provide comfort and perspective.
  3. Document the Incident: If applicable, document the incident. Write down what happened, including the date, time, location, and any witnesses. This documentation may be useful if you decide to take further action.
  4. Reflect on the Situation: Reflect on the incident to understand the context and any possible contributing factors. This self-reflection can help you decide on the best course of action and how to address the issue constructively.
  5. Address the Issue Directly: If you feel comfortable, consider addressing the person in authority privately. Choose a calm and non-confrontational approach, expressing how their actions affected you and seeking clarification or resolution.
  6. Seek Guidance from HR or a Supervisor: If the humiliation occurred in a professional setting, consult with human resources or a higher-ranking supervisor. Share your concerns and provide any documentation you may have. They may be able to mediate or address the issue appropriately.
  7. Know Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with your rights, especially in a workplace setting. If the humiliation involves discrimination, harassment, or any form of misconduct, it’s essential to know what protections you have under the law.
  8. Consider Counseling or Therapy: Seeking the help of a professional counselor or therapist can provide additional support in coping with the emotional aftermath of public humiliation. They can offer guidance on processing emotions and developing coping strategies.
  9. Evaluate Your Options: Assess whether the incident warrants further action, such as filing a formal complaint or pursuing legal avenues. Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and the potential courses of action available to you.
  10. Focus on Self-Care: Prioritize self-care during this challenging time. Engage in activities that bring you comfort and relaxation, and surround yourself with positive influences.

Remember, you are not alone, and seeking help is a sign of strength. Every situation is unique, so trust your instincts and take steps that align with your well-being and personal values.

Human Rights Law and the Protection Against Humiliation

Human rights law is a crucial framework established to safeguard the inherent dignity and worth of every individual. Among the myriad rights enshrined in international treaties and conventions, protection against humiliation holds a prominent place. Humiliation, whether inflicted by state actors, individuals, or societal norms, undermines the principles of equality, dignity, and respect that are the cornerstone of human rights.

Understanding Humiliation in the Context of Human Rights

Humiliation can manifest in various forms, including verbal abuse, discriminatory practices, degradation, and torture. In the context of human rights law, the prohibition against humiliation is closely tied to broader principles such as the right to life, liberty, and security of person, freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, and the right to be free from discrimination.

International Instruments Safeguarding Against Humiliation

Several international instruments explicitly address the issue of humiliation and aim to protect individuals from its detrimental effects. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, declares in Article 1 that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” This foundational principle establishes the basis for protecting individuals from humiliation.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) further elaborates on the right to be free from torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment in Article 7. Similarly, the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) specifically addresses actions that lead to humiliation, emphasizing the absolute prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.

Regional human rights instruments, such as the European Convention on Human Rights and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, also contain provisions aimed at preventing and remedying humiliation.

State Responsibilities and Accountability

States bear the primary responsibility for ensuring the protection of human rights, including safeguarding individuals from humiliation. This involves not only refraining from directly engaging in such practices but also implementing measures to prevent and address humiliation perpetrated by non-state actors.

National legal systems play a crucial role in holding perpetrators accountable for acts of humiliation. Courts and legal institutions, both at the domestic and international levels, can adjudicate cases related to human rights violations and provide redress to victims.

Challenges in Addressing Humiliation

Despite the clear legal frameworks in place, challenges persist in effectively addressing humiliation. In some instances, cultural norms, societal attitudes, and historical legacies may perpetuate practices that humiliate certain groups of people. Addressing these deeply ingrained issues requires a comprehensive and sustained effort, combining legal measures with education and awareness-raising initiatives.

The protection against humiliation is an integral aspect of human rights law, emphasizing the fundamental dignity and equality of all individuals. International treaties and conventions provide a robust framework for addressing and preventing acts of humiliation, placing the onus on states to uphold these principles. While challenges persist, the ongoing commitment to human rights and the collective effort to raise awareness can contribute to a world where every person is treated with the respect and dignity they inherently deserve.

The repercussions on mental health

The repercussions of humiliation on mental health are profound and multifaceted. Human rights violations that involve humiliation can leave lasting psychological scars, affecting the well-being and mental health of individuals. Understanding the impact on mental health is crucial for addressing the broader consequences of such violations and providing effective support for victims.

  1. Psychological Trauma: Humiliation often leads to psychological trauma, causing individuals to experience intense emotional distress and a sense of powerlessness. The trauma resulting from humiliation can manifest as anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and other mental health disorders.
  2. Deterioration of Self-Esteem: Humiliation erodes a person’s sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Continuous exposure to humiliating experiences can contribute to feelings of shame, inadequacy, and a negative self-image. Individuals may internalize the degrading messages, leading to a diminished sense of their own value.
  3. Social Isolation: Victims of humiliation may withdraw from social interactions out of fear of further mistreatment or due to feelings of shame and embarrassment. Social isolation can exacerbate mental health issues, as the support networks that are crucial for resilience and recovery may be weakened or severed.
  4. Impact on Relationships: Humiliation can strain interpersonal relationships, including family, friends, and romantic partnerships. The emotional toll of humiliation can make it challenging for individuals to trust others, express vulnerability, or form meaningful connections, contributing to a sense of loneliness and isolation.
  5. Development of Maladaptive Coping Mechanisms: In response to the emotional pain caused by humiliation, individuals may develop maladaptive coping mechanisms such as substance abuse, self-harm, or other destructive behaviors. These coping strategies may provide temporary relief but can exacerbate mental health challenges over time.
  6. Long-Term Effects on Identity: Humiliation can have a lasting impact on an individual’s sense of identity. It may shape how victims perceive themselves and how they believe others see them. Rebuilding a positive self-image and identity can be a complex and lengthy process that often requires therapeutic intervention and support.
  7. Barriers to Seeking Help: Stigma and fear of judgment can act as barriers to seeking mental health support for those who have experienced humiliation. Overcoming these barriers is essential to ensure that individuals receive the assistance they need to cope with the psychological consequences of human rights violations.
  8. Interconnected Societal Impact: The mental health repercussions of humiliation extend beyond the individual level, affecting communities and societies as a whole. Persistent patterns of humiliation can contribute to a culture of fear, mistrust, and division, hindering social cohesion and collective well-being.

Addressing the mental health repercussions of humiliation requires a comprehensive approach, combining legal, psychological, and social interventions. Efforts should focus on preventing further human rights violations, providing mental health support for victims, and promoting societal awareness and education to foster empathy and understanding. By acknowledging the mental health impact of humiliation, societies can work towards creating environments that uphold human dignity and promote the well-being of all individuals.

The consequences of a person of authority not apologizing if the person they publicly humiliate, and the consequences of an investigation

When a person of authority publicly humiliates someone and fails to apologize, the consequences can be far-reaching and detrimental. This not only affects the individuals directly involved but can also have broader implications for trust in institutions, organizational culture, and the overall well-being of those affected. If the incident prompts an investigation, the consequences may become even more significant. Here are several potential repercussions:

  1. Erosion of Trust: Failure to apologize can lead to a severe erosion of trust between the person of authority and those they lead or represent. Trust is a foundational element in any relationship, especially in professional or institutional settings. Without a sincere apology, trust may be difficult to rebuild, damaging the overall effectiveness of leadership.
  2. Negative Organizational Culture: The behavior of a person in authority sets the tone for the organizational culture. If a leader engages in public humiliation without acknowledging the wrongdoing, it can foster a toxic work environment. This negativity may permeate the organization, affecting morale, productivity, and the overall well-being of employees.
  3. Employee Disengagement: Public humiliation and the absence of a genuine apology can lead to employee disengagement. When employees feel unsupported or disrespected, their motivation and commitment to their work may decline, negatively impacting productivity and organizational success.
  4. Legal Consequences: If the incident of public humiliation involves violations of laws or workplace regulations, an investigation may uncover legal liabilities. Failure to apologize may exacerbate the legal consequences, potentially leading to lawsuits, fines, or other legal actions against the person of authority or the organization.
  5. Reputational Damage: Public humiliation can result in significant reputational damage for both the individual in authority and the organization. This damage can affect relationships with stakeholders, clients, and the broader community. A lack of apology may further intensify negative perceptions and hinder efforts at reputation repair.
  6. Impact on Mental Health: The person who was publicly humiliated may experience severe emotional distress and mental health consequences. Without a sincere apology, the healing process may be impeded, potentially leading to prolonged emotional suffering, anxiety, and other mental health challenges.
  7. Employee Retention Issues: A hostile work environment created by public humiliation and the absence of an apology can contribute to employee turnover. Skilled and talented individuals may choose to leave the organization in search of a more supportive and respectful workplace, leading to a loss of valuable human capital.
  8. Heightened Scrutiny and Investigations: The lack of an apology may trigger increased scrutiny from internal or external bodies, such as human resources departments, ethics committees, or regulatory agencies. Investigations may be initiated to assess the extent of the wrongdoing and determine whether organizational policies or laws were violated.
  9. Leadership Credibility Damage: Failure to apologize can seriously damage the credibility of the person in authority. Leadership effectiveness is closely tied to credibility, and a leader who is unwilling to take responsibility for their actions may struggle to maintain the respect and support of their followers.
  10. Organizational Change Requirements: Investigations may reveal systemic issues within the organization that contributed to the incident. This could necessitate broader organizational changes, such as revised policies, enhanced training programs, or a reassessment of leadership structures to prevent similar occurrences in the future.

The consequences of a person of authority not apologizing after publicly humiliating someone can have wide-ranging effects, impacting trust, organizational culture, legal standing, and the well-being of individuals involved. Investigations become crucial in uncovering the truth, determining accountability, and guiding necessary changes to prevent recurrence.

Further Reading


The consequences of humiliating someone in public are multifaceted and can have far-reaching implications. In a world that values empathy and understanding, it is crucial to recognize the potential harm caused by public humiliation and actively work toward creating a more compassionate and supportive society. Whether online or offline, fostering an environment where individuals feel safe and respected is not just a personal responsibility but a collective one that contributes to the well-being of society as a whole.

When you want to complain but fear repercussions, consider whistle-blowing or get someone to complain for you anonymously.

There should be no excuse to humiliate someone publically or privately. Humiliating some reflects at the end of the day on who you are. If you have been bullied or humiliated do not take it out on another person.

#humiliation #humiliting #degrading #embarrasing #publichumiliation #humanrights #mentalhealth #selfesteem #socialisolation #bullying #emotionaldistress


DWP PIP Mandatory Reconsideration

Image Credit
Disclaimer: This article may use trigger-sensitive wording.

Understanding DWP PIP Mandatory Reconsideration: A Guide to Navigating the Process

The UK’s Disability Living Allowance (DLA) was replaced by the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) in 2013, a move aimed at providing targeted support to individuals with disabilities. However, navigating the PIP system can be complex, and applicants may sometimes find themselves dissatisfied with the initial decision regarding their entitlement. In such cases, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) offers a process called Mandatory Reconsideration.

What is a Mandatory Reconsideration?

A Mandatory Reconsideration is a formal review of the DWP’s decision regarding a PIP claim. It allows applicants to challenge an unfavorable decision and provide additional evidence or information that may have been overlooked in the initial assessment. It’s an essential step in the appeals process, and understanding how it works can be invaluable for claimants seeking to secure the PIP benefits they need.

When Should You Request a Mandatory Reconsideration?

Before pursuing a Mandatory Reconsideration, claimants should receive a letter from the DWP detailing their PIP decision. This letter outlines the reasoning behind the decision and explains the process for requesting a Mandatory Reconsideration if the claimant disagrees with the outcome.

Common reasons for requesting a Mandatory Reconsideration include:

  1. Inadequate Assessment: Claimants may feel that the assessment they underwent did not accurately reflect their disability or the impact it has on their daily lives.
  2. Overlooked Evidence: Claimants might have submitted evidence with their initial application that was not considered during the assessment.
  3. Medical Evidence: New medical or healthcare information becomes available after the initial decision, which could support the claimant’s case.
  4. Changed Circumstances: Claimants may experience a change in their health or disability status after the initial decision that affects their entitlement.

The Request Process

To initiate a Mandatory Reconsideration, claimants must follow these steps:

  1. Contact the DWP: Within one month of receiving the decision letter, claimants must contact the DWP to request a Mandatory Reconsideration. This can be done over the phone or in writing.
  2. Provide Supporting Information: When requesting the reconsideration, it’s crucial to explain why you believe the initial decision is incorrect. You should include any additional evidence that supports your case.
  3. Await the Outcome: After submitting your request, the DWP will review your case, taking into consideration the information you provided. This process can take some time, and claimants should be patient while waiting for a response.
  4. Review the Decision: The DWP will send you a Mandatory Reconsideration Notice, which will outline their new decision. If the decision is favorable, you will receive the PIP benefits you are entitled to. If it remains unfavorable, you can proceed to the appeals process.

The Appeals Process

If your Mandatory Reconsideration is unsuccessful, you have the option to appeal to the independent tribunal system. This step allows you to present your case in front of an independent panel. Legal representation can be beneficial at this stage, as the process becomes more formal and adversarial.

Understanding the PIP Mandatory Reconsideration process is crucial for claimants seeking to secure the benefits they need to support their disabilities. While it may seem like a challenging and lengthy process, it offers an opportunity to challenge unfavorable decisions and provide additional evidence that can make a substantial difference. By knowing when and how to request a Mandatory Reconsideration, claimants can navigate the system more effectively and work toward obtaining the support they require.

According to DWP as per a telephone conversation today they do not have the option to appeal the decision online even though I said I would write an article and cite the website proving them wrong.

This is their strategy to act dumb so that people do not bother. For the convenience of our readers, I have also embedded the PDF of the ‘Mandatory Reconsideration Form CRMR1 01/18.

However, the email on the form is either incorrect or there is an error as all (8) emails I sent to them have bounced. If it is true from the agent yesterday that said they do not do online mandatory reconsideration, they are not eco-friendly, do not care about carbon emissions, and do not care about the planet or people with mental health conditions.

Even after stating that I got the information online, the agent started to get agitated and patronizing asking what website I got the information from. When I replied on the Government website she did not want to talk any further and stated she had nothing else to add and wished to end the call. She was arrogant and accused me of hurting her feelings lol. Considering I have mental health issues and a short fuse, what do they expect from me?

Citations – CRMR1 01/18:

PIP Mandatory Reconsideration Form Download


There is a time frame that one has 1 month to ask for an appeal even though I was told a letter was sent out on the 12th of October 2023 I have not had one yet at the time of this article being published.

DWP states it takes 10 working days for a letter to arrive in other words 2 weeks. I have asked for a copy of the original report to be sent out again which as you guessed is another 10 working days. (Can you see where this is going,? the timeframe to appeal would have passed – (how to save public money is all I will say).

Not trusting them as far as I could throw them I sent an email to Capita on 20/10/23 at contactus@capita-pip.co.uk after much deliberation the woman I spoke to with a South African accent contradicted herself and first said DWP had NOT had any documentation from me but then changed her tune and said they did receive a letter albeit not sure if it was the (44 pages), I sent them as I sent two. So I am now confused did they receive my 44-page letter or not?

She continued to say they do not do online appeals.

I also sent (8) emails to DWP: dwponline.helpdesk@dwp.gsi.gov.uk and (2) to Capita: contactus@capita-pip.co.uk (no doubt there will be a third). I will be amazed if they fail to do a reconsideration, based on the evidence I have sent them. It very much looks like I may have to contact Capita again.

I will continue until my voice is heard.

What I plan on doing if I keep hitting a brick wall is a press release and notifying OCD & Mind Charities CEOs, plus Sir Charles Walker (who suffers from OCD and is an MP).

“I may not be able to do things of an abled body person and just because I have mental and neurological disorders does not make me stupid”. According to DWP because I am an editor of this site I cannot have mental health problems, which aligns with them stigmatizing that someone with mental health disorders cannot be intellectual.”, this is called ‘DISCRIMINATION’!

‘Famous People With OCD Past & Present’

HMCTS Access -Tribunal Registration

A Personal Independence Payment (PIP) tribunal serves as a vital component of the United Kingdom’s disability system, offering individuals the opportunity to challenge decisions made by the Department for Work and Pensions regarding their eligibility for PIP benefits. These tribunals are independent bodies tasked with reviewing and reassessing PIP claims, and they play a crucial role in ensuring that individuals receive the support they genuinely require.

The PIP tribunal process is designed to be impartial and transparent. Claimants who believe their initial PIP application was unfairly denied or their benefit award insufficient can request an appeal. This appeal is typically heard by a panel consisting of a legally qualified chairperson and a healthcare professional, both of whom are independent of the initial decision-making process.

During the tribunal, claimants have the opportunity to present their case, provide medical evidence, and share their experiences to demonstrate how their disability or health condition affects their daily life and functionality. The panel carefully considers all the information presented, with a focus on assessing the claimant’s eligibility based on the criteria set out in PIP regulations.

The PIP tribunal process is crucial in ensuring that individuals receive the support they need to manage their disabilities or health conditions effectively. It embodies the principles of fairness and justice, enabling claimants to have their cases reviewed by an impartial body, ultimately contributing to a more equitable and compassionate system.

Appeal a benefits decision: Submit your appeal – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Challenging a PIP decision – appealing against the decision – Citizens Advice

Personal Experience – I am now citing:

  1. Emotional Distress: This assessment has caused me emotional distress.
  2. Health Deterioration & Repercussions: My mental health has deteriorated since the phone assessment, all of which I document online and in my letter.
  3. Medical Records: The assessor did not do her research properly and did not know when I was diagnosed with the disorders, (even though she claimed to have access to my medical records),. She also did not know what a certain medication was ‘Solpadol’ and asked me to clarify.
  4. Distress: The assessor caused me distress by talking about self-harm, which I have documented online and in the letter. (I asked her to stop as I did not want to have negative thoughts, but she persisted, I told her not to plant seeds and I did not want to think negatively).
  5. Humiliation: The assessor humiliated me by talking about my hygiene (This is a very personal and often taboo topic of discussion).
  6. Phone Recording: According to ‘Capita’ an audio phone recording is being sent out to me, even though I was not notified the call was being recorded (this is again GDPR and is against the law).
  7. Discrimination: DWP discriminated against someone who has mental health and neurological issues (which is against the law). DWP has assumed that because I have mental and neurological disorders I am capable of doing things of an able-bodied person...On the contrary, I have to disinfect everything around me, I cannot deal with people in the physical realm without being two meters apart.
  8. Assessment Report: I should have had 26 points on my assessment (cited in the letter). To this date at the time of this publication, I have not had a report from the DWP/PIP and do not know what they have written, I am second guessing as my PIP has stopped.
  9. Retraining: I wish the assessor to be reprimanded and retrained about dealing with people with mental health and neurological disorders.
  10. Data Protection: sensitive data has been sent by 2nd class Royal Mail and has gone missing and DWP has a blasé attitude (oh well, we will just send you copies) with no real concern that that information could have got into the wrong hands.

Data Protection – Sensitive Data




I know I talk about my health publically but I do not give my full name, address, D.O.B, and National Insurance number for all of sundry to do what they please.

Sending sensitive data via Royal Mail or any postal service requires careful consideration and adherence to data protection and security protocols to ensure the information remains confidential and protected during transit. Here are some essential steps and precautions to take when sending sensitive data by Royal Mail:

  1. Data Encryption: If possible, encrypt the sensitive data before sending it. Encryption ensures that even if the package is intercepted, the contents will remain secure. Many encryption tools and software are available for this purpose.
  2. Choose a Secure Envelope or Packaging: Use a plain, tamper-evident envelope or packaging for the sensitive data. Avoid using envelopes that might indicate the content, like ones labeled with “Confidential.” You can purchase secure mailing envelopes designed to protect sensitive documents.
  3. Registered or Special Delivery: Consider sending the data via Royal Mail’s “Special Delivery” service. This service offers to track, guarantees next-day delivery, and includes compensation cover. Registered post is also a secure option.
  4. Double-check the Address: Ensure the recipient’s address is correct and complete to avoid any misdirection or loss.
  5. Do Not Disclose Sensitive Content in the Address Line: Do not write sensitive details in the address line, such as the nature of the content or any reference to the data being sensitive.
  6. Use Security Features: Some secure envelopes have security features like hidden patterns that show evidence of tampering. You can use such envelopes to enhance security.
  7. Keep a Record: Make a record of what you’re sending, including a detailed list of enclosed documents. This will be helpful if any issues arise.
  8. Take Photographs: Take a photo of the package before sealing it. This can serve as evidence if you need to prove the condition of the package when it was sent.
  9. Insurance: Consider insuring the package, especially if the data is of high value.
  10. Avoid Weekend or Holiday Deliveries: Try to avoid sending sensitive data on a Friday or before a public holiday. This reduces the time the package spends in transit over the weekend or during holiday periods.
  11. Secure Drop-off: If possible, drop off the package directly at a Royal Mail branch rather than relying on collection services or street mailboxes.
  12. Track the Delivery: If you’re using a service with tracking, monitor the progress of the delivery online to ensure it reaches its destination safely.
  13. Recipient Verification: Communicate with the recipient to ensure they are available to receive the package or confirm that the address is correct.
  14. Document Retention: Keep a copy of all relevant documentation, including receipts and tracking information, in case you need to prove that you sent the package.

By following these precautions and using secure packaging and services, you can reduce the risk associated with sending sensitive data via Royal Mail. Remember that data protection regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), may impose specific requirements on how you handle and transfer sensitive personal data. Always consider legal and regulatory obligations when sending sensitive information.


The woman I spoke to today had an accent and I could barely understand her. She agreed to speak slowly. At first, she seemed empathetic but as the call continued she started talking over me, she was trying to silence what I was saying and made out I did not know what I was talking about. It got to the stage where she contradicted herself and later admitted that DWP received a letter albeit which one remains to be seen as I sent two plus 8 emails to DWP and 2 to Capita. I will be sending my third to ‘Capita’ shortly.



Experiencing discrimination, humiliation, data compromise, and emotional distress at the hands of the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in the context of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) can be deeply distressing. If you find yourself in such a situation, it is crucial to take the following steps to address the issue and seek resolution:

  1. Document Everything: Begin by meticulously documenting each incident, including dates, times, locations, individuals involved, and the nature of the discrimination, humiliation, data compromise, and emotional distress you experienced. This record will be valuable when reporting the issue and seeking support.
  2. Contact the DWP: Reach out to the DWP as soon as possible to report the problem. You can contact their customer service helpline or local office. Clearly and concisely explain the situation, providing details from your documentation. Request an investigation into your concerns.
  3. Seek Support: Consider contacting advocacy groups or organizations that specialize in disability rights and discrimination issues. They can provide guidance and support throughout the process.
  4. Request a Review or Reconsideration: If your issue is related to PIP eligibility or assessment, you may need to request a Mandatory Reconsideration, as explained in a previous article. This is a formal process that allows you to challenge an unfavorable decision.
  5. File a Complaint: If your concerns are not adequately addressed through the DWP’s customer service, you can submit a formal complaint. The DWP should have a complaints procedure in place. Make sure to follow this procedure carefully.
  6. Involve a Legal Advisor: If the situation persists and your complaints are not resolved, it may be necessary to involve a legal advisor or solicitor who specializes in discrimination and disability law. They can help you explore legal remedies and represent your interests.
  7. Engage with Regulatory Bodies: In the UK, you can also reach out to regulatory bodies such as the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) if your data has been compromised. They can investigate data protection breaches and enforce penalties if necessary.
  8. Mental Health Support: Do not hesitate to seek mental health support if you have endured emotional distress as a result of these experiences. Speak to your healthcare provider or a mental health professional for guidance and assistance.

Remember that discrimination, humiliation, data compromise, and emotional distress are not acceptable, and individuals have rights and legal protections in such cases. Pursuing a resolution can help address the immediate issues and may also contribute to systemic improvements in how such matters are handled by government agencies like the DWP.

This is opening a can of worms as I will also throw my GP into the limelight for negligence. If these entities have no regard for one’s mental health they should not be surprised that people’s health does not deteriorate.

Doctor Negligence

Further Reading:

#dwp #pip #personalindependancepayments #emotionaldistress #discrimination #disabilitydiscrimination #humiliation #degrating #selfharm #suicide #gdpr #dataprotection




You can stay anonymous, we just want to hear your stories, good, bad, and ugly, so that people struggling and being discriminated against have the motivation not to give up.

If you are a disabled entrepreneur and are struggling to write content or documents because of visual impairment or dyslexia, we have your back. If you are a business or publication and want content contributions on any health or business topics, we are only a few clicks away.

UK Banner

UK Banner

Blue Butterfly Logo

Editor Faces Discrimination

Disability Discrimination

Invitation For Journalists – “PIP DISCRIMINATION”

Disabled Entrepreneur Editor Faces Discrimination and Rejection by DWP’s PIP

In a shocking turn of events, the esteemed editor of the “Disabled Entrepreneur” and “Disability UK Online Journal” has been subjected to discrimination and humiliation by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) over her Personal Independence Payments (PIP) claim. Despite battling obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) for over three decades, her claim was unjustly rejected, with assessors deeming her as fit as an able-bodied individual without considering the overwhelming medical evidence at their disposal.

This courageous editor, who has valiantly confronted the challenges of OCD, Clinical Depression, and Cerebellar Atrophy, has not only managed to maintain her professional life but has also transformed her personal struggles into a source of inspiration for countless individuals with disabilities. The online platform she created, “Disabled Entrepreneur,” originally conceived as a form of self-help therapy, has evolved into a powerful tool for empowerment and support for disabled individuals striving to carve their path in the business world.

In her quest for medical assistance, the NHS failed her. The editor penned not one, not two, but three heartfelt letters to her general practitioner (GP), imploring support for her own health and wellbeing. Regrettably, these pleas seemed to have fallen on deaf ears, as the GP Practice Manager merely entered the letters into the healthcare system without further action, citing that if the editor did not like how the GP surgery operated to find another doctor as they were not obligated to provide any care.

Tragically, because of the PIP rejection (this has happened to her once before which she appealed) and the ensuing emotional distress caused by the DWP’s actions, this remarkable editor has become a virtual recluse, venturing out of her home a mere two times in the last five years. The discriminatory treatment by PIP has not only been a source of humiliation. Still, it has also taken a severe toll on her physical and mental health, leading to a stark deterioration in her overall well-being.

The shocking and deeply troubling case of this editor stands as a glaring example of the injustice that many individuals with disabilities face when attempting to access the support they rightfully deserve. It raises urgent questions about the fairness and accuracy of the PIP assessment process and the vital need for reform to ensure that disabled individuals are treated with the dignity, respect, and compassion they unquestionably deserve.

Editor Calls Upon Journalists to Shed Light on Her Plight

In her pursuit of justice and in the hope of shedding light on the pervasive issues within the disability support system, the editor of “Disabled Entrepreneur” and “Disability UK Online Journal” is extending a heartfelt invitation to journalists and media outlets to share her compelling story.

This courageous editor, who has faced discrimination and unjust rejection of her PIP claim despite her lifelong battle with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and clinical depression, and in the last decade cerebellar atrophy and cognitive impairment, believes that her ordeal is a poignant reflection of the challenges many disabled individuals encounter when navigating the intricacies of the support system.

By opening her life and struggles to the public eye, she aims to bring attention to the inherent flaws in the PIP assessment process and the emotional distress and hardship it inflicts on countless disabled individuals. She hopes that her story will resonate with journalists who recognize the urgency of reforming the system to ensure fair treatment, respect, and dignity for those living with disabilities.

Through the power of storytelling, the editor aspires to spark a much-needed conversation about the discrimination faced by disabled individuals and the critical need for change within the system. Her invitation to journalists is a call for empathy, awareness, and solidarity, and she is ready to share her experiences, medical evidence, and personal journey with those who are willing to amplify her message. Together, they can help drive the change needed to ensure a more just and equitable future for all individuals with disabilities.


#pip #personalindependancepaymests #dwp #discrimination #humiliation #mentalhealth #mentalhealthdisorders #ocd #obssessivecompulsivedisorder #mentalhealthdeterioration #selfhelptherapy #medicalnegligence #disabledentrepreneur

Contact The Editor Using The Form Below:

Blue Butterfly Logo
Verified by MonsterInsights