DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR - DISABILITY UK

Disability UK Online Health News Journal, Disability Business Directory, All-In-One Disability Business Solutions. Working in Partnership With Cymru Marketing Journal (CMJUK) & UK Website Designers

Category: PIP (Page 1 of 2)

Breaking Down Mental Health Stigma: Understanding the Statistics

September 14, 2023 / Andrew Jones

Breaking Down Mental Health Stigma: Understanding the Statistics

Mental health stigma continues to be a pervasive issue in society, hindering the well-being of countless individuals worldwide. While progress has been made in recent years to raise awareness and reduce the stigma surrounding mental health, there is still much work to be done. Understanding the statistics behind mental health stigma is essential in order to address this issue effectively and promote a more compassionate and inclusive society.

Prevalence of Mental Health Issues

To understand the depth of mental health stigma, it’s crucial to first acknowledge the prevalence of mental health issues. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 264 million people suffer from depression globally, and around 20 million individuals are diagnosed with schizophrenia. Additionally, anxiety disorders affect an estimated 284 million people worldwide. These statistics illustrate that mental health conditions are far from rare and impact a significant portion of the global population.

Stigma-Related Statistics

Underreporting: One significant aspect of mental health stigma is underreporting. Many individuals hesitate to seek help or disclose their mental health issues due to fear of judgment or discrimination. Research from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) suggests that approximately 60% of people with mental health disorders do not receive treatment. Stigma plays a substantial role in this underutilization of mental health services.

Workplace Stigma: Mental health stigma also affects workplaces. According to a study conducted by the Center for Workplace Mental Health, approximately 83% of employees feel that mental health issues are stigmatized in their workplace. Fear of potential repercussions or damage to their professional reputation often prevents employees from seeking the help they need.

Stereotypes and Discrimination: Stereotypes and discrimination related to mental health conditions persist in society. The National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) reports that around 46% of people believe that those with mental illnesses are prone to violence. This unfounded belief contributes to the perpetuation of stereotypes and further stigmatization.

Impact on Youth: Mental health stigma has severe consequences for young people. Half of all lifetime cases of mental health conditions begin by the age of 14, according to WHO. Stigmatization can discourage young individuals from seeking help, potentially leading to worsened mental health outcomes.

Consequences of Stigma: Mental health stigma doesn’t just affect individuals; it has far-reaching consequences for society as a whole. Some of the notable consequences include:

Delayed Treatment: Stigma often leads to delays in seeking treatment, which can worsen the severity of mental health conditions.

Isolation: People who experience stigma may become socially isolated, leading to feelings of loneliness and depression.

Reduced Quality of Life: Stigma can hinder individuals from fully participating in daily activities and enjoying a high quality of life.

Economic Costs: Mental health stigma results in lost productivity in the workplace and increased healthcare costs.

Lower Self-Esteem: Stigmatized individuals may internalize negative beliefs about themselves, leading to lower self-esteem.

Efforts to Combat Stigma: While the statistics surrounding mental health stigma are concerning, there is hope. Numerous organizations, campaigns, and individuals are working tirelessly to combat stigma and create a more accepting society. Initiatives like Mental Health Awareness Month and anti-stigma campaigns encourage open conversations about mental health and reduce misconceptions.

The Damaging Effects of Stigmatizing Individuals with Mental Health Disorders

Stigmatizing individuals with mental health disorders can have profoundly detrimental effects on their mental and emotional well-being. While the consequences of such stigmatization may not be immediately apparent, they can lead to a worsening of symptoms and a reluctance to seek help, exacerbating the challenges faced by those already grappling with mental health issues.

  1. Increased Isolation: One of the most immediate consequences of stigmatization is social isolation. When individuals with mental health disorders experience negative judgment or ridicule, they often withdraw from social interactions out of fear of further rejection. This isolation can intensify feelings of loneliness and contribute to the deterioration of their mental health.
  2. Reduced Self-Esteem: Stigmatizing individuals with mental health disorders reinforces negative self-perceptions. The derogatory remarks and attitudes they encounter can lead to a decrease in self-esteem, causing them to believe that they are somehow “less than” or “broken.” Such beliefs can become deeply ingrained and further erode their sense of self-worth.
  3. Reluctance to Seek Help: Stigmatization also discourages individuals from seeking the help they desperately need. The fear of judgment or discrimination can prevent people from opening up about their struggles or seeking professional treatment. This reluctance to seek help can result in delayed or inadequate care, leading to the worsening of their mental health condition over time.
  4. Self-Stigma: In some cases, individuals with mental health disorders may internalize the negative stereotypes and prejudices they encounter, a phenomenon known as self-stigma. They may begin to believe that they are solely responsible for their condition or that they should be able to “snap out of it.” This self-blame can intensify their suffering and create additional barriers to recovery. This can also lead to imposter syndrome.
  5. Escalation of Symptoms: Stigmatization can exacerbate the symptoms of mental health disorders. The stress and anxiety caused by social rejection and discrimination can trigger or worsen conditions such as depression and anxiety disorders. This, in turn, can lead to a vicious cycle where deteriorating mental health leads to more stigmatization and vice versa.
  6. Barriers to Employment and Education: Stigmatization can have practical consequences as well. People with mental health disorders may face discrimination in the workplace or educational institutions, limiting their opportunities for growth and financial stability. This added stressor can contribute to the deterioration of their mental health.

Further Reading

‘OCD paralysed my life for 20 years – but now I am finally happy’ (msn.com)

Stigma and discrimination | Mental Health Foundation

Stigma around mental health – Mind

Mental Health Act Statistics, Annual Figures – 2020-21 – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Overwhelming majority of people severely affected by mental illness report discrimination still widespread (rethink.org)

The stigma of mental disorders – PMC (nih.gov)

https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/imposter-syndrome/

Conclusion

The statistics surrounding mental health stigma are a stark reminder that there is much work to be done in creating a more inclusive and compassionate society. As we continue to raise awareness, challenge stereotypes, and advocate for policy changes, we can reduce the stigma surrounding mental health. By doing so, we can ensure that more individuals seek the help they need and ultimately lead healthier, happier lives.

It is crucial to recognize that degrading or stigmatizing individuals with mental health disorders does not help them in any way; instead, it harms them and exacerbates their struggles. Promoting understanding, empathy, and acceptance is essential in creating a supportive environment where those with mental health issues can seek help without fear of judgment or discrimination.

Addressing mental health stigma through education, awareness campaigns, and inclusive policies is essential in ensuring that individuals feel comfortable seeking the help they need. By fostering a more compassionate and accepting society, we can reduce the damaging effects of stigmatization and support those facing mental health challenges on their path to recovery.

ADVERTISEMENT

Content Writing On All Health Topics.

#mentalhealth #mentalhealstigma #mentalhealthdiscrimination #labelling #discrimination #impostersyndrome #sterotype #division #credibility #socialstatus #mentalhealthstatistics

The contradiction concerning over-the-counter Painkillers and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments rejections.

September 13, 2023 / Andrew Jones
DWP

Disclaimer: The following article discusses the sensitive topics of suicide and government policies related to suicide prevention. We understand that these subjects can be emotionally charged and deeply personal. The information provided in this article is intended for educational and informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical, psychological, or legal advice. It is essential to approach discussions about suicide with empathy, respect, and a commitment to promoting mental health awareness and support. If you or someone you know is in crisis or experiencing thoughts of self-harm or suicide, we urge you to seek immediate assistance from a qualified mental health professional, a crisis hotline, or a trusted support network. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official stance or policies of any government, organization, or institution. Government policies and approaches to suicide prevention can vary widely and may change over time. For accurate and up-to-date information on government initiatives and resources related to suicide prevention, please consult official government websites or relevant authorities. We encourage readers to engage in thoughtful and constructive discussions on these critical topics and to seek information from a variety of reputable sources to form a well-rounded understanding of the issues at hand. Your mental health and well-being are of paramount importance, and there are resources available to provide the support and assistance you may need.

The Contradiction Concerning Over-The-Counter Painkillers and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Assessments Rejections.

In recent years, the world has witnessed a concerning increase in suicide rates, prompting governments and healthcare systems to take proactive measures to tackle this pressing issue. While addressing the complex causes of suicide requires a multifaceted approach, one unexpected area of focus has emerged: the regulation of over-the-counter painkillers, especially paracetamol (acetaminophen). The correlation between painkiller sales and suicide rates may not be immediately apparent, but it highlights an important aspect of suicide prevention efforts.

The Paracetamol Dilemma

Paracetamol, commonly known as acetaminophen in the United States and Canada, is one of the most widely used over-the-counter painkillers worldwide. It is generally safe when taken as directed, but excessive or prolonged use can lead to severe liver damage and even death. Unfortunately, paracetamol overdose is a frequent method of self-harm among those contemplating suicide.

Understanding the Connection

To comprehend the relationship between paracetamol and suicide, one must first grasp the psychology behind self-harm and the factors that lead individuals to take this extreme step. Suicide often results from a complex interplay of emotional, social, and psychological factors. However, the immediate accessibility of lethal means can significantly influence whether an individual acts on their suicidal thoughts.

Suicide Articles

Government Intervention

Governments around the world are taking proactive steps to address the connection between painkiller availability and suicide rates. One of the most effective measures has been limiting the quantity of paracetamol that can be purchased at one time and imposing stricter regulations on its sale. These restrictions are designed to deter impulse acts of self-harm while ensuring that people who genuinely need the medication for pain management can still access it.

In addition to quantity limits, some countries have introduced blister packaging for paracetamol and similar medications. This makes it more difficult for individuals to access large quantities of the drug at once, further reducing the likelihood of impulsive self-harm.

Education and Awareness

Government initiatives are not limited to regulatory changes. Suicide prevention programs emphasize education and awareness campaigns to help individuals identify and seek help for mental health issues. These initiatives encourage people to reach out to those in crisis and to support them in finding appropriate professional help.

Moreover, healthcare providers are being trained to recognize signs of self-harm and suicidal ideation in their patients. Early intervention and mental health support can be crucial in preventing self-destructive behavior.

The Role of Healthcare Professionals

Healthcare professionals play a vital role in addressing the issue of paracetamol overdose as a method of self-harm. They should remain vigilant and inquire about the reasons behind a patient’s painkiller purchase, especially if it appears excessive or unusual. Detecting suicidal intent early can be a lifesaving intervention.

While suicide is a complex issue with no single solution, governments and healthcare systems are increasingly recognizing the connection between painkiller accessibility and suicide rates. By implementing stricter regulations on the sale of over-the-counter painkillers like paracetamol and promoting mental health awareness, we can take significant steps toward reducing impulsive self-harm incidents and saving lives. As we continue to address the multifaceted problem of suicide, a thoughtful approach to painkiller sales regulation is a crucial element in our collective efforts to prevent this tragic loss of life.

Why is the government taking action about over-the-counter painkillers but in the next breath driving people to the brink of suicide with PIP assessment rejections https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/pip-assessments-pushing-people-to-the-brink-of-suicide-the-editors-experience/

The apparent contradiction between government actions concerning over-the-counter painkillers and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments is a complex issue rooted in the broader context of government policies, healthcare, and social support systems. It reflects the need for a comprehensive and holistic approach to public policy.

  1. Diverse Government Departments: The government consists of various departments and agencies, each responsible for different aspects of policy and administration. Decisions related to healthcare and disability benefits (such as PIP assessments) are managed by one set of agencies, while those related to drug regulation and suicide prevention may be overseen by others. These departments often have different objectives, resources, and decision-making processes.
  2. Varied Approaches to Healthcare and Disability: Healthcare policies and disability benefit programs are designed to address different needs and concerns. While efforts to regulate painkiller sales are aimed at reducing impulsive self-harm incidents, PIP assessments are intended to evaluate an individual’s eligibility for disability benefits. The criteria for these assessments can be stringent to ensure that benefits are allocated to those who genuinely need them, but this process can sometimes be challenging for applicants.
  3. Policy Priorities and Resources: Government departments allocate resources and prioritize policies based on various factors, including budget constraints, public opinion, and political agendas. It’s possible for different departments to have differing priorities and levels of funding, which can lead to variations in the approach and effectiveness of their respective programs.
  4. Complex Societal Issues: Issues like suicide prevention and disability support are inherently complex and multifaceted. They involve addressing the physical and mental health of individuals, navigating bureaucratic systems, and responding to societal attitudes and stigma. These complexities can result in inconsistencies in policy implementation.
  5. Public Advocacy and Awareness: Public advocacy and awareness play a crucial role in shaping government policies. When specific issues gain more public attention and advocacy, governments may respond with changes in policy or increased funding. In some cases, discrepancies between policies may reflect variations in public awareness and advocacy efforts.

How to prevent over-the-counter painkillers from being purchased in multiple stores

Preventing individuals from purchasing over-the-counter (OTC) painkillers in multiple stores can be challenging, as it relies on a combination of regulatory measures, technological solutions, and public awareness efforts. Here are some strategies that can be employed to address this issue:

  • Limit Quantity Purchases: Government regulations can restrict the quantity of OTC painkillers that individuals can purchase in a single transaction. Implementing quantity limits helps prevent large-scale purchases for non-medical purposes.
  • Real-time Tracking Systems: Develop or adopt real-time tracking systems for OTC medication sales. Pharmacies and retailers can connect to a centralized database that monitors purchases across different stores. If a customer exceeds the allowable limit, the system can flag the purchase.
  • Identification and Registration: Introduce a system that requires customers to provide identification when purchasing OTC painkillers. This can help track an individual’s purchases across different stores over time.
  • Pharmacist Consultation: Encourage pharmacists to engage customers in conversations about the appropriate use of OTC medications. If someone is attempting to make multiple purchases, pharmacists can intervene and assess the situation.
  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Launch public awareness campaigns about the dangers of misuse and overdose of OTC painkillers. Educate the public about the risks associated with multiple purchases and the importance of responsible medication use.
  • Retailer Training: Train retail staff to recognize potential misuse of OTC medications and the signs of excessive purchasing. Establish protocols for store employees to follow when they suspect misuse.
  • Age Verification: Implement age verification checks for OTC medication purchases, similar to those used for age-restricted products like alcohol and tobacco. This can deter younger individuals from attempting multiple purchases.
  • Collaboration with Law Enforcement: Collaborate with law enforcement agencies to monitor and investigate instances of bulk purchasing or stockpiling of OTC medications for non-medical purposes.
  • Community Pharmacies: Encourage individuals to establish a relationship with a specific community pharmacy. Frequenting a single pharmacy can help pharmacists better monitor an individual’s medication history.
  • Data Sharing and Reporting: Establish mechanisms for pharmacies and retailers to share data on suspicious purchasing patterns. Reporting unusual purchases to authorities can help identify potential cases of abuse.
  • Legislation and Penalties: Enact legislation that imposes penalties for individuals found to be deliberately purchasing excessive quantities of OTC medications for non-medical purposes. The threat of legal consequences can act as a deterrent.
  • Prescription Requirement: Consider reclassifying certain OTC painkillers as prescription-only if misuse and abuse become widespread and difficult to control through other means.

Preventing the multiple purchases of OTC painkillers is a multifaceted challenge that requires collaboration between government agencies, healthcare professionals, retailers, and the public. Combining regulatory measures, technological solutions, and educational efforts can help reduce the risks associated with the misuse of these medications.

No Smoke Without Fire

The pressing question of whether governments engage in tactics like “blowing smoke” or distracting to divert attention from real issues is often grounded in public skepticism and mistrust of political leaders. While it’s essential to approach such claims critically and evaluate them on a case-by-case basis, it is not uncommon for governments, like any other organizations or individuals, to employ communication strategies that can include diversion or redirection of public attention.

Here are a few key points to consider when assessing whether a government may be attempting to divert attention from real issues:

  1. Political Messaging: Governments often seek to shape public discourse and perception through strategic communication. This can involve highlighting certain issues, achievements, or policy initiatives while downplaying or avoiding others. Critics may perceive this as an attempt to distract from more pressing matters.
  2. Media Relations: Government agencies may interact with the media to control the narrative around specific issues. They might release information strategically to draw attention away from negative news or controversies. However, this practice is not unique to governments and is common in public relations across various sectors.
  3. Political Theater: Political leaders may engage in symbolic acts or events to create the appearance of addressing an issue while not necessarily addressing the root causes or substantive concerns. This can give the impression of action without meaningful change.
  4. Public Opinion Management: Governments may use polling and public opinion research to understand public sentiment and adapt their messaging accordingly. Sometimes, this can result in emphasizing certain issues that align with popular sentiment or downplaying divisive or challenging topics.
  5. Transparency and Accountability: Advocacy groups, investigative journalism, and public discourse play a crucial role in holding governments accountable for their actions and decisions. Transparency and scrutiny are essential for maintaining a healthy democracy.

It’s important for citizens to remain informed, critically evaluate information from multiple sources, and engage in open discussions about the actions and policies of their governments. While some may view government actions as attempts to distract from real issues, others may perceive them as legitimate efforts to address pressing concerns.

Ultimately, the effectiveness and ethicality of government communication strategies depend on their alignment with democratic principles, transparency, accountability, and the degree to which they address the genuine needs and concerns of the public. Public awareness, civic engagement, and a free press are essential components of holding governments accountable for their actions and ensuring that they prioritize the welfare of their citizens.

Conclusion

It’s important to recognize that government actions, policies, and decisions are often the subject of debate and scrutiny. Citizens, advocacy groups, and policymakers continually work to hold governments accountable for their actions and to advocate for policies that they believe are just and effective.

In the case of PIP assessments, concerns about the process’s fairness and impact on vulnerable individuals have led to ongoing discussions and potential reforms. These discussions can result in changes to policies and procedures aimed at improving the system.

Ultimately, addressing complex societal issues such as mental health, disability support, and suicide prevention requires a comprehensive and coordinated approach involving multiple stakeholders, including government, healthcare providers, advocacy groups, and the broader community. Achieving a balanced and effective policy landscape is an ongoing challenge that requires ongoing dialogue and advocacy for positive change.

Further Reading

Paracetamol & painkiller sales could be further reduced as the government tackles suicide prevention (msn.com)

Suicides in England and Wales – Office for National Statistics (ons.gov.uk)

Samaritans’ Media Guidelines

https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/pip-assessments-pushing-people-to-the-brink-of-suicide-the-editors-experience/

ADVERTISEMENT

Content Writing On All Health Topics.

#suicideprevention #suicide #paracetamol #painkillers #pip #dwp #personalindependencepayments #nhs

PIP Assessments: Pushing People to the Brink of Despair

September 11, 2023 / Andrew Jones / 2 Comments

Disclaimer: The provided article addresses topics concerning mental well-being, including the term “suicide.” It’s crucial to acknowledge that conversations surrounding mental health and suicide can be delicate and possibly distressing for certain individuals. This article is meant solely for informative purposes and should not be seen as a replacement for expert mental health guidance, assessment, or therapy. If you or someone you are acquainted with is grappling with mental health challenges, including contemplations of suicide, we strongly urge you to reach out to a certified mental health specialist, call emergency services, or use our useful links page to find relevant support.

PIP Assessments: Pushing People to the Brink of Suicide

The Personal Independence Payment (PIP) system, introduced in the United Kingdom as a replacement for the Disability Living Allowance (DLA), was intended to provide financial assistance to those with disabilities and long-term health conditions. While its aims are commendable, the reality of PIP assessments has been far from the promised support. Instead, for many vulnerable individuals, these assessments have become a source of immense stress, despair, and in some tragic cases, a factor pushing them to the brink of suicide.

The PIP Assessment Process

The PIP assessment process involves a series of evaluations to determine an individual’s eligibility for financial support. This process requires claimants to complete a lengthy and complex application form detailing their medical history, daily living needs, and mobility issues. After submission, an assessment provider, often a private company (PIP), conducts telephone or face-to-face assessments based on the documentation provided.

The Flawed System

  1. Lack of Compassion: Critics argue that the PIP assessment process often lacks the necessary empathy and understanding required for assessing the needs of people with disabilities and health conditions. Assessors, who are not necessarily healthcare professionals, have been accused of insensitivity and a lack of understanding of complex conditions.
  2. Inconsistencies: The assessment process has been plagued by inconsistencies, leading to cases where individuals with similar conditions receive different outcomes. This lack of standardization can lead to frustration and despair among claimants who perceive the process as arbitrary.
  3. Stress and Anxiety: The very nature of PIP assessments, with their stringent criteria and extensive documentation, can trigger immense stress and anxiety for claimants. The prospect of losing essential financial support adds to this psychological burden.
  4. Lengthy Appeals Process: If an individual’s PIP claim is denied, they have the option to appeal. However, the appeals process can be protracted and emotionally draining, with long waiting times and no guarantee of success. This adds further stress to claimants who are already vulnerable.

The Human Cost

It is essential to recognize that behind every statistic is a human story. Many claimants have reported the profound impact of PIP assessments on their mental health:

  1. Depression and Anxiety: The stress of the assessment process and the fear of losing vital financial support have led to increased cases of depression and anxiety among claimants.
  2. Isolation: For those with limited mobility or severe health conditions, financial support from PIP can be a lifeline that enables them to engage with the world. Losing this support can result in isolation, further exacerbating mental health issues.
  3. Suicidal Ideation: There have been alarming reports of individuals who have contemplated or taken their lives after their PIP claims were denied or reduced. The fear and hopelessness engendered by the system can push vulnerable individuals to the brink.
  4. Deteriorating Health: Some individuals, unable to cope with the stress of the assessment process and the resultant financial strain, have reported worsening health conditions.

Calls for Reform

The harrowing experiences of individuals undergoing PIP assessments have led to calls for reform within the system. Advocates for change propose several key improvements:

  1. A More Compassionate Approach: Critics argue that PIP assessments should be conducted by healthcare professionals who have a deeper understanding of the complexities of disability and health conditions, promoting a more compassionate and accurate assessment.
  2. Simplify the Process: Reducing the complexity of the application process and minimizing paperwork would make it more accessible and less stressful for claimants.
  3. Fair and Consistent Assessments: Implementing stricter standards for assessors and ensuring consistency in decision-making can help restore trust in the system.
  4. Support for Mental Health: Recognizing the impact of PIP assessments on mental health, claimants should be offered mental health support services as part of the process.

Is asking the question about suicide dangerous and should it be asked by PIP assessors?

The question of whether PIP (Personal Independence Payment) assessors should directly ask claimants about suicide is a complex one. PIP assessors are typically not mental health professionals but are tasked with evaluating an individual’s eligibility for disability benefits based on their health and functional abilities. While their primary focus is on assessing physical and daily living aspects, they should also be aware of the mental health implications of their assessments.

Here are some considerations:

  1. Assessing Mental Health: PIP assessors should be trained to recognize signs of mental health issues during their assessments. Some claimants may have mental health conditions that impact their daily living activities, which are relevant to the assessment. Assessors should be trained to ask about these issues in a sensitive and non-judgmental manner when it’s relevant to the assessment process.
  2. Connection Between Mental Health and Disability: Some individuals with mental health conditions may struggle with daily living activities or mobility issues that are relevant to the PIP assessment criteria. In such cases, it may be appropriate for assessors to ask questions related to mental health.
  3. Sensitivity and Training: Assessors should receive proper training on how to approach sensitive topics, including mental health and suicide. This training should emphasize empathy, active listening, and a non-judgmental attitude.
  4. Collaboration with Mental Health Professionals: In cases where there are clear indications of mental health issues, assessors should consider collaborating with mental health professionals or referring claimants to appropriate mental health services.
  5. Respect for Privacy: While assessors may inquire about mental health issues when relevant to the assessment, they should also respect the claimant’s privacy and autonomy. They should create a safe and non-coercive environment for any discussions related to mental health.

It’s important to strike a balance between addressing mental health concerns when relevant to the assessment and respecting the boundaries and sensitivities of the individuals being assessed. PIP assessors should prioritize the well-being of claimants and, when necessary, refer them to mental health professionals or appropriate support services.

Ultimately, the appropriateness of asking about suicide during a PIP assessment depends on the specific circumstances and the claimant’s condition. The key is to approach the topic with care, sensitivity, and an understanding of the potential mental health implications, and to ensure that individuals receive the support they need, which may include access to mental health services.

Conclusion

The PIP assessment process was meant to provide support to those in need, but it has proven to be a flawed system that pushes vulnerable individuals to the brink of despair and, in some tragic cases, suicide. It is crucial to acknowledge the human cost of a system that often lacks compassion and consistency. Reforms that prioritize the well-being of claimants and address the flaws in the assessment process are desperately needed to prevent further harm and suffering in the future.

An assessor who asks the questions poses the risk of planting a seed in someone’s head. Someone who has attempted suicide is not going to tell the truth for fear of being judged. A person who has attempted suicide may feel shameful if it was found out and hence may never admit it.

“It is a very dangerous path to tread, mentioning suicide. Instead, the assessor should ask “How is your mental health on a scale of 1-10” rather than plant intrusive thoughts into someone’s head”.

When the claimant says they are not comfortable talking about the subject the assessor should not press the claimant further.

When the claimant says they do not want to have intrusive thoughts then the assessor should move on to the next question. This actually happened to the editor of this site. The editor felt under duress to answer and was not comfortable answering the questions.

Intrusive Thoughts / Sick Leave

It is embarrassing and shameful that you can be driven to such a low point and feel you have no other way.

The editor because of the phone call has decided to step back to try and recover from the humiliating, judgemental ordeal.

The editor stated that where she had worked hard to move forward and had progressed, through her self-help therapy including hypnosis, she now feels she has moved backward because of having to recall her abusive relationship and a flood of emotions and intrusive thoughts came rushing in. Even having to explain her knee injury brought back memories where her knee was purposely dislocated (03/02/13 – A&E).

Mental Health VS Intelligence (Innudendo)

The editor explained the humiliation she felt as well as the condescending manner of the assessor when she asked questions such as “how her website makes money” and the innuendo that because she suffers from mental health she cannot be that intellectual or successful. https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/can-someone-have-ocd-and-still-be-intellectual/

Incompetence

She went on to say that she was asked questions not based on the evidence of her medical records and felt under scrutiny to prove herself. The assessor asked about the editor’s medication in particular co-codamol (codeine) and shortly after was asked “What is Solpadol“.

Intrusive Thoughts

The editor went on to say she felt uncomfortable by the whole ordeal and made her feel inadequate. She told me she suffers from intrusive thoughts and today’s fiasco only made her mental health worse. The editor has social anxiety and suffers from OCD (Diagnosed in 1992) and Cerebellar Atrophy (Diagnosed in 2011) and felt scrutinized as if she of all people was trying to scam the system.

Considering the editor was diagnosed with OCD over 30 years ago she felt she was not treated with dignity or respect.

“PIP Should Go By Medical Records and Facts Not Put Patients Through Unnecessary Distress”!

Addendum 20/09/23

Rather than write a completely different post I would like to add the following article published today: Inhumane disability benefits assessments need reforms but not the way Tories think (msn.com) I am taken aback by how many people are venting their disdain over how they have been treated. Unfortunately, MSN disallows hyperlinks, otherwise, I would have shared this article.

Further Reading

https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/personal-independence-payment-pip-telephone-assessment/

Pushing people to the brink of suicide: the reality of benefit assessments | Frances Ryan | The Guardian

PIP investigation: ‘Horrific’ suicide question sparks fresh assessment inquiry calls – Disability News Service

https://lifehacker.com/how-to-plant-ideas-in-someones-mind-5715912

Does asking about suicide and related behaviors induce suicidal ideation? What is the evidence? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24998511/

PIP assessor told claimant to ignore her ‘irrelevant’ suicide attempt… then challenged her son to a fight – Disability News Service

PIP assessor walked out! – Benefits and Work Forum

Pip assessor has lied – Benefits and Work Forum

PIP Assessors Get £50 Bonuses For Meeting Targets Says Whistleblower | Same Difference (samedifference1.com)

PIP investigation: ‘Lie after lie after lie’ – Disability News Service

Fury As Nurses Offered Private Healthcare Perk To Become DWP Benefits Assessors | HuffPost UK News (huffingtonpost.co.uk)

‘Humiliating’ PIP Assessments Being Held At Luxury Spa Owned By Millionaire Duncan Bannatyne | HuffPost UK News (huffingtonpost.co.uk)

ADVERTISEMENT

Content Writing On All Health Topics.

#pip #pipassessment #suicide #suicidalthoughts #intrusivethoughts #condescending #incompetantasserors #medicalrecords #facts

Revealed: Covert Deal to Cut Help for Pupils in England with Special Needs

September 11, 2023 / Andrew Jones
Special Needs Downs Syndrome
Image Credit

Revealed: Covert Deal to Cut Help for Pupils in England with Special Needs

In a shocking revelation, a covert deal has come to light that threatens to slash support for pupils in England with special needs. This revelation raises serious concerns about the government’s commitment to inclusive education and the well-being of some of the most vulnerable students in our society.

The Covert Deal

The covert deal in question involves a series of behind-the-scenes negotiations between government officials and local authorities, which have resulted in a significant reduction in funding and support for pupils with special needs. These negotiations have taken place away from the public eye, making it difficult for concerned citizens and stakeholders to voice their opinions or raise objections.

Under the guise of cost-saving measures and budget constraints, these covert agreements have led to the scaling back of crucial services and resources that pupils with special needs rely on for their education and development. These services include dedicated teaching assistants, access to specialized equipment, and tailored learning plans designed to meet individual needs.

Consequences for Pupils with Special Needs

The consequences of this covert deal are dire for pupils with special needs. These students require additional support to thrive in an educational environment, and any reduction in resources can have a profound impact on their learning experiences. Here are some of the potential consequences:

  1. Reduced Academic Progress: Without the necessary support, pupils with special needs may struggle to make academic progress, leading to lower educational outcomes and reduced future opportunities. Without the necessary support, special needs students may struggle to keep up with their peers academically. This can result in lower grades, decreased self-esteem, and diminished confidence in their abilities.
  2. Increased Isolation: Special needs students often rely on one-on-one support and personalized interventions. Cutting these services can lead to increased isolation, both academically and socially.
  3. Mental Health Implications: The stress and anxiety that can result from a lack of support can take a toll on the mental health of these vulnerable students, potentially leading to long-term psychological issues. They may experience increased frustration, anxiety, and depression, which can hinder their overall well-being and ability to focus on learning.
  4. The strain on Families: Parents and caregivers of pupils with special needs may find themselves under increased stress and financial burden as they attempt to fill the gaps left by reduced school support. Parents and caregivers of special needs students often play a vital role in providing support outside of school hours. Cuts in school support can place a heavier burden on these families, both emotionally and financially, as they try to fill the gaps in their children’s education.
  5. Long-Term Societal Impact: Failing to adequately support pupils with special needs can have long-term societal consequences, including higher rates of unemployment and dependence on social services.
  6. Limited Post-Education Opportunities: Inadequate support during their formative years can limit the long-term prospects of special needs students. They may struggle to acquire the necessary skills and qualifications for further education or future employment, leading to a cycle of dependency on social services.
  7. Lost Potential: Every special needs student has unique talents and abilities. Cuts in support can prevent them from realizing their full potential, robbing society of the valuable contributions they could make in various fields and industries.

The Importance of Inclusive Education

Inclusive education is a fundamental principle that recognizes the right of every student, regardless of their abilities or disabilities, to access quality education and receive the necessary support to succeed. By undermining this principle through covert deals that cut support for pupils with special needs, we are not only failing these students but also undermining the very essence of our education system.

Inclusive education benefits not only students with special needs but also their peers, teachers, and society as a whole. It fosters empathy, promotes diversity, and prepares all students to live and work in a diverse world. It is a reflection of our commitment to equal opportunities and a fair society.

Conclusion

The revelation of a covert deal to cut help for pupils in England with special needs is deeply troubling and demands urgent attention from policymakers, educators, and the public. To ensure a fair and inclusive education system, we must hold our government accountable and advocate for the rights and well-being of all students, regardless of their abilities or disabilities. It is our collective responsibility to protect the future of the most vulnerable members of our society and uphold the principles of inclusive education.

The covert cuts in support for special needs students in England are a grave concern that threatens the well-being and future prospects of some of the most vulnerable individuals in our society. It is essential for educators, policymakers, and the public to advocate for the rights of special needs students and ensure that they receive the support and resources they need to thrive in the educational system and beyond. The well-being and success of these students should be a top priority for any inclusive and compassionate society.

Further Reading

Revealed: Covert deal to cut help for pupils in England with special needs | UK news | The Guardian

Schools in England forced to cut support for special needs pupils | Schools | The Guardian

Special-needs support beyond crisis, heads say – BBC News

ADVERTISEMENT

Learn In Wales Logo
Domain Name For Sale!

#specialneeds #dwp #pip #autism #adhd #downssyndrome #personalindependencepayments

Controversial New PIP Proposal Threatens Lifelong Health Condition Claimants

September 9, 2023 / Andrew Jones / 0 Comments

Disclaimer: This article uses the words ‘suicide’. If you have suicidal thoughts, talk to someone about them. If you do not have any friends or family reach out to the Samaritans on 116 123 For Free. Sometimes talking to a stranger can help you put things into perspective and help you tackle daily challenges. Arrange an appointment with your local doctor and explain how you are feeling. Do not drink alcohol or take recreational drugs as this may make the matter worse. Seek professional help ASAP. You can also check out our useful links page of various resources relating to mental health here!

Controversial New PIP Proposal Threatens Lifelong Health Condition Claimants

In recent years, the United Kingdom’s welfare system has faced its fair share of scrutiny and criticism. The Personal Independence Payment (PIP), designed to support individuals with lifelong health conditions or disabilities, is once again under the spotlight due to a contentious new proposal. The government’s plan to remove 30,000 claimants from the review process each year has sparked a heated debate about the rights and support of those who rely on this crucial financial assistance.

The Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Overview

PIP is a non-means-tested benefit that provides financial support to individuals with disabilities or long-term health conditions. It is designed to help them cover the extra costs they may incur as a result of their condition, such as mobility aids, personal care, or transportation expenses. PIP has two components: one focusing on daily living needs and another on mobility.

The Proposal

The government’s new proposal seeks to significantly reduce the number of PIP claimants who undergo regular reviews to assess their eligibility for continued support. Under the current system, most PIP claimants are subject to regular reassessments to determine if their condition has improved or worsened, affecting their eligibility for the benefit.

The proposed changes would exempt 30,000 claimants with lifelong health conditions or disabilities from these reassessments each year. Supporters argue that this move will reduce bureaucratic red tape, ease the burden on individuals already dealing with health challenges, and save taxpayers’ money.

The Controversy

While the government frames the proposal as a cost-saving measure that streamlines the system, it has sparked outrage among disability rights advocates, healthcare professionals, and opposition politicians. Several key concerns have emerged:

  1. Vulnerable Individuals at Risk: Critics argue that the proposal fails to recognize the unpredictable nature of many lifelong health conditions. Some conditions may worsen over time, even if they initially appear stable. Exempting individuals from regular assessments could lead to vulnerable people losing their much-needed financial support.
  2. Lack of Transparency: Critics have raised concerns about the lack of transparency and clarity in the proposal. It remains unclear how the government intends to determine which claimants will be exempt from reviews and what criteria will be used. This ambiguity raises questions about fairness and consistency in the decision-making process.
  3. Potential for Abuse: Some fear that removing regular assessments could open the door to abuse by individuals who no longer require PIP support but continue to receive it. This could strain the welfare system and limit resources for those in genuine need.
  4. Mental Health Considerations: The proposal focuses primarily on physical health conditions but does not adequately address the needs of individuals with mental health conditions. Mental health can fluctuate, and people with such conditions may require ongoing support that regular assessments help determine.
  5. Burden on Healthcare Professionals: Healthcare professionals responsible for assessing claimants play a critical role in ensuring fair and accurate decisions. The proposal could increase the pressure on these professionals and potentially result in rushed or less accurate assessments.

The Impact on Mental Health.

  1. Financial Stress: One of the most immediate consequences of being incorrectly declined PIP is financial stress. Individuals who rely on PIP to cover additional expenses related to their disability may suddenly find themselves struggling to make ends meet. This financial strain can lead to anxiety, depression, and increased mental health difficulties.
  2. Feelings of Injustice: Discovering that your claim has been wrongly denied can trigger feelings of injustice and frustration. People may feel as though their needs and struggles have been dismissed, which can erode their sense of self-worth and lead to anger, resentment, and emotional distress.
  3. Uncertainty: An incorrect denial can leave individuals in a state of uncertainty about their future. They may not know how to access the support they need or how to challenge the decision. This lack of clarity can contribute to feelings of anxiety and helplessness.
  4. Isolation: Disabilities and health conditions can already lead to feelings of isolation and loneliness. An incorrect PIP claim denial can exacerbate this sense of isolation, as individuals may feel like they are not being heard or understood by society and the welfare system.
  5. Exacerbation of Health Conditions: The stress and anxiety resulting from a PIP denial can worsen an individual’s health condition or disability. This can create a vicious cycle where declining mental health leads to further physical health challenges, making it even more essential for individuals to receive the support they need.
  6. Depression and Anxiety: Many individuals who rely on PIP already face higher rates of depression and anxiety due to the challenges associated with their conditions. An incorrect denial can intensify these mental health conditions, leading to symptoms such as increased sadness, worry, and panic attacks.
  7. Reduced Quality of Life: When individuals are denied the support they need, their overall quality of life can suffer. They may struggle to participate in social activities, access healthcare, or maintain their independence, all of which can take a toll on their mental well-being.
  8. Could Lead to Suicide: The psychological toll of being incorrectly declined a claim for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) can, in some tragic cases, escalate to the point of contemplating suicide. When individuals with disabilities or lifelong health conditions are denied access to the vital financial support they rely on, it can lead to profound despair and hopelessness. The emotional strain, financial hardship, feelings of injustice, and isolation that often accompany an incorrect denial can overwhelm a person, pushing them to a breaking point where they may see suicide as the only way out.
  9. Loss of Trust: An incorrect PIP denial can erode an individual’s trust in the welfare system and healthcare professionals. Moreover, it can make the individual’s mental health deteriorate. Therefore may become hesitant to seek help or apply for benefits in the future.

Being incorrectly declined a claim for PIP can have far-reaching consequences on an individual’s mental health.

It can lead to financial stress, emotional distress, feelings of injustice, and a deterioration of overall well-being.

It is crucial for the welfare system to ensure that assessments and decisions are accurate and fair to prevent these harmful outcomes and support individuals who genuinely need assistance. Moreover, providing effective avenues for challenging decisions and appealing claims is essential to mitigate the negative impact on mental health when mistakes are made.

Conclusion

The new PIP proposal to remove 30,000 claimants with lifelong health conditions or disabilities from the review process each year has ignited a fierce debate over the rights and support of vulnerable individuals. While the government argues that these changes will reduce bureaucracy and costs, critics emphasize the potential harm it could cause to those who rely on PIP to meet their daily living needs.

The proposed PIP reform carries significant implications for individuals with invisible disabilities. These conditions, often not immediately evident to others, include mental health disorders, chronic pain, and neurological conditions, among others. The reform’s plans to remove claimants could disproportionately affect those with invisible disabilities.

The proposed PIP reform, advocated by Justin Tomlinson MP, the Minister for Disabled People, is expected to generate substantial cost savings for the government. By exempting claimants with lifelong health conditions or disabilities from annual reassessments, this initiative aims to streamline the system and reduce administrative expenses, ensuring that resources are better targeted to those in genuine need while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

As the proposal moves through the legislative process and undergoes further scrutiny, it is essential for all stakeholders to consider the implications carefully. Striking the right balance between streamlining the system and ensuring that those in genuine need receive support will be crucial in shaping the future of the Personal Independence Payment program in the UK.

Further Reading:

New PIP proposal to remove 30,000 claimants with lifelong health conditions or disabilities from the review process each year (msn.com)

ADVERTISEMENT

Anyone wishing to share their stories and have an online record of their disabilities can contact us and we will set up an online journal free of charge. Online journals are a form of therapy!

Content Writing On All Health Topics.

#pip #personalindependencepayments #mentalhealth #suicide #vulnerable #dwp #nhs #stress #anxiety #depression #ocd #emotionaldistress #justintomlinsonmp #invisibledisabilities

Scrapping Sickness Benefits for Those Able to Work from Home

September 7, 2023 / Andrew Jones / 0 Comments

Scrapping Sickness Benefits for Those Able to Work from Home: A Controversial Move in Challenging Times

In recent years, the debate surrounding sickness benefits has gained momentum, with increasing attention given to the notion that these benefits should be reconsidered for individuals who are well enough to work from home. The push to reassess these benefits has stirred a complex dialogue, particularly concerning Personal Independence Payment (PIP), a crucial source of financial support for people with disabilities, including those dealing with mental health issues.

The Debate Over Sickness Benefits

The call to end sickness benefits for individuals who can work from home is driven by several factors. Advocates argue that it can save significant resources and ensure that the support system is primarily directed toward those who genuinely cannot work due to their health conditions. This perspective asserts that with the advent of digital technology and remote work opportunities, many individuals can contribute to the workforce without needing to leave their homes.

However, critics argue that this approach may oversimplify the complexities of health conditions and disabilities. They contend that not all individuals with health issues can easily transition to remote work. Furthermore, they caution against making sweeping decisions that may inadvertently harm vulnerable populations.

The Cost of Living and Mental Health

One key factor influencing the debate over sickness benefits is the rising cost of living, which has had a profound impact on people’s mental health. As the cost of housing, food, and other essentials continues to increase, financial stress has become a significant source of anxiety and depression for many individuals. This stress can be especially acute for those relying on sickness benefits or disability allowances, as these payments often fall short of covering the rising costs of living.

Reducing or eliminating sickness benefits for those capable of remote work could further exacerbate the mental health challenges faced by many. The pressure to work from home, even when dealing with health issues, may lead to increased stress and reduced well-being, ultimately hampering overall productivity.

Mental Health Disabilities and the Inability to Function in the Outside World

It is crucial to recognize that not all disabilities are visible or easily accommodated by remote work. Individuals with mental health disabilities, such as OCD, often face unique challenges that make working outside the home exceptionally difficult. OCD is characterized by intrusive and distressing thoughts (obsessions) and repetitive behaviors (compulsions). For people with severe OCD, these symptoms can interfere with their ability to function effectively in a traditional workplace setting.

The concept of scrapping sickness benefits for those who can work from home may inadvertently overlook the struggles of individuals with mental health disabilities. These individuals may require specialized support, therapy, or reasonable accommodations to manage their conditions and maintain employment. Eliminating their access to sickness benefits could have dire consequences, including worsening their mental health and reducing their chances of successful employment.

Conclusion

The debate over whether to scrap sickness benefits for individuals who can work from home is a complex and contentious one. While it’s essential to ensure that public resources are allocated efficiently, it’s equally important to consider the diverse needs of people with disabilities, especially those facing mental health challenges like OCD.

In addressing these issues, it’s vital to strike a balance between fiscal responsibility and compassion for individuals who require support to maintain their mental health and employment. A more nuanced approach, taking into account the specific circumstances of each case and providing tailored support, may offer a more equitable solution in a world where the cost of living continues to rise, and mental health struggles are increasingly prevalent.

#mentalhealth #backtowork #invisibledisabilities #dwp #pip #personalindepencepayments #disabilitylivingallowance #dla

Further Reading:

Sickness benefits to be scrapped for people who are well enough to work from home (msn.com)

https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/understanding-the-complex-relationship-between-ocd-anxiety-and-stress/

ADVERTISEMENT

We write articles on anything related to health. We also write articles for disabled entrepreneurs who may find it difficult to write for their businesses.

Content Writing On All Health Topics.
Contact us Today!

Understanding the Complex Relationship Between OCD, Anxiety, and Stress

September 3, 2023 / EDITOR

Disclaimer**

This article mentions the wording about self-harm and suicide.

Understanding the Complex Relationship Between OCD, Anxiety, and Stress

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), anxiety disorders, and stress are three interrelated mental health conditions that can significantly impact an individual’s quality of life. Each of these conditions has its unique features and challenges, but they often coexist and exacerbate one another.

I. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder is a chronic mental health condition characterized by persistent, intrusive thoughts (obsessions) and repetitive behaviors or mental acts (compulsions) aimed at reducing distress. These obsessions and compulsions can consume a person’s life and become incredibly distressing.

  1. Obsessions: OCD often begins with intrusive and distressing thoughts or mental images, which are irrational and unwanted. Common themes include fears of contamination, fears of harming others, or an intense need for symmetry and order. These thoughts can be incredibly distressing and lead to anxiety.
  2. Compulsions: To cope with the anxiety caused by obsessions, individuals with OCD engage in repetitive behaviors or mental acts. These compulsions are performed to alleviate anxiety or to prevent a feared event. For instance, someone with contamination obsessions may engage in excessive handwashing.

II. Anxiety Disorders

Anxiety disorders encompass a range of conditions, including Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Panic Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, and others. While the specific symptoms vary among these disorders, they all involve excessive and chronic worry, fear, or nervousness.

  1. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): GAD is characterized by excessive worry and anxiety about various aspects of life, often without a specific trigger. Individuals with GAD may experience physical symptoms like muscle tension, restlessness, and fatigue.
  2. Panic Disorder: This disorder involves recurrent panic attacks, which are sudden and intense periods of fear and discomfort. Panic attacks can lead to further anxiety about having more attacks, creating a cycle of fear.
  3. Social Anxiety Disorder: Social anxiety is marked by an intense fear of social situations and interactions. Individuals with this disorder may avoid social events or endure them with extreme distress.

III. Stress

Stress is a normal response to challenging or threatening situations. However, chronic stress can have adverse effects on both physical and mental health. It often results from various life stressors such as work, relationships, finances, or health issues.

The Body’s Stress Response: When we encounter a stressor, our body releases hormones like cortisol and adrenaline. This “fight-or-flight” response prepares us to deal with the threat. However, chronic stress can lead to an overactive stress response, which can negatively impact health.

The Complex Interplay

The relationship between OCD, anxiety, and stress is intricate and multifaceted:

  1. OCD and Anxiety: OCD inherently involves anxiety, as individuals experience distressing obsessions and engage in compulsions to alleviate this distress. The obsessive thoughts generate anxiety, and the compulsive behaviors offer temporary relief.
  2. Stress and Anxiety: Chronic stress can contribute to the development of anxiety disorders or exacerbate existing ones. Stressful life events can trigger or worsen anxiety symptoms, making it challenging to manage.
  3. Stress and OCD: Stress can also trigger or worsen OCD symptoms. When individuals with OCD face high-stress situations, their obsessions and compulsions may intensify, further reducing their ability to cope with stress.

Managing OCD, Anxiety, and Stress

  1. Therapy: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), particularly exposure and response prevention (ERP), is the gold standard for treating OCD. CBT is also effective for many anxiety disorders. Learning to manage stress through relaxation techniques can be beneficial.
  2. Medication: In some cases, medication may be prescribed to alleviate symptoms. Antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are often used for both OCD and anxiety disorders.
  3. Lifestyle Changes: Adopting a healthy lifestyle, including regular exercise, a balanced diet, and adequate sleep, can help reduce stress and anxiety. Mindfulness and relaxation practices, such as yoga and meditation, can also be valuable tools.

Further Reading

Editors Final Thoughts – My Symptoms, Treatment & Therapy

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, anxiety disorders, and stress are interconnected conditions that can have a profound impact on an individual’s well-being.

Recognizing the complex relationship between these conditions is crucial for effective treatment and management. With the right therapeutic approaches, support, and lifestyle adjustments, individuals can find relief and improve their overall mental health and quality of life.

If you or someone you know is struggling with these issues, seeking professional help is the first step towards healing and recovery.

As a sufferer of OCD, (germ contamination), I am the first to admit that OCD can be very overwhelming especially when I am under a lot of stress. My way of coping is to disinfect things around me. I have been a sufferer for over thirty years and I do believe OCD is inherited as my mother, grandmother, and uncle all suffered from the disorder. I also block out all negativity in my life to try and protect my mental health from deteriorating. Everyone has different ways of coping with grief, stress, and negativity. I choose to socially disconnect.

GP-AI Logo
Domain & Logo & App Code For Sale!

I conduct my own self-help therapy as my GP is as useful as a chocolate fireguard. I have reached out to them on multiple occasions and have evidence they put my letter on the system but never bothered to get back to me at all, other than to discuss my medication only once in the last 3 years and then was told the pharmacist read my letter to the GP.

I quarantine certain areas in my home which are a no-go to anyone visiting, although I do not socialize or entertain and the only people that come into the property are either the landlord or the contractors/engineers, which I keep at arm’s length.

Social Disconnection

My OCD has worsened in the last few years. I have socially disconnected myself from the physical world because not only would my OCD be embarrassing wearing latex gloves out in public but also the fear of being touched or touching something that I could not disinfect. My OCD has worsened because of events that have happened in my life, that I am trying to heal from.

I do have intrusive thoughts and sometimes if I do not do something fast enough I am convinced something bad will happen (also known as magical ocd). I try to override my thoughts by thinking this is just BS, I am stronger than that but sometimes it is hard to think this way which leads me into a dark spate of depression.

Some days I struggle to get through the day, and I tend to procrastinate. I have obligations and know I cannot abandon them, hence forcing myself to carry on, but is difficult when I overthink or worry. My medication works wonders when I need to go to sleep as it stops my mind wandering, I am usually out like a light within 30 minutes. Does it help with my OCD, not really.

When things get so overwhelming I tend to vent on my online journal, which does help to a certain degree because I am able to vent and release my anxieties to the world and know someone out there is reading it.

Germ Awareness Logo Domain Name For Sale!
Domain Name For Sale!

I am now a recluse entrepreneur. Don’t get me wrong in a medical emergency I would have no option but to leave my home and worry about the consequences of being germ contaminated afterwards. Where I have not been able to disinfect things in the past I have simply thrown things away.

“I can function in my home by adapting my disability around my life”.

I have everything delivered to my door so there is no reason for me to leave my home. In all I have in the last five years left my home twice and both times caused me so much anxiety and distress, I am dreading the next time I have to leave.

I really could do with my own transport so that I could avoid public transport such as taxis, or buses. I have never been comfortable getting on buses and having to be cramped up like sardines sitting next to dirty people. Having my own transport would help with my disability.

I go through about 800 -1000 pairs of latex gloves a month and 6 liters of Dettol disinfectant. It has to be the Dettol brand as I am not confident in my head that any other brand could do a better job.

I do have a category about OCD and have pointed www.ocd.cymru to the 73+ articles and pages. I also have the domain www.germawareness.co.uk which I am in the middle of writing a series of superhero books for kids relating to germs.

Famous People With OCD Past & Present

Anxiety & Stress

I am now anxious about my PIP assessment due on the 11th of this month. I am anxious about the questions, with one in particular which could be a trigger. Even if you have never had thoughts of harming yourself, planting the seed could be dangerous. Has it ever crossed my mind? At my lowest point if I am being totally honest, yes, but I have always tried to reason with myself that these thoughts are BS and I am a stronger person. I have plenty of things to live for even though living is not as ideal as I would want it to be but I carry on. I am anxious, will I be judged?

Grief

I have endured grief over 19 times in my life, if I am being totally honest, and have for all intents and purposes tried to block the events/incidents out of my life. If I have made reference to grief in the past and omitted anything, it is because I have forgotten parts of my past, although some are more difficult to erase.

I want to bury my past!

I am going to try and explore Psychodynamic Therapy to see if it can help me.

#ocd #obsessivecompulsivedisorder #pip #personalindependancepayments #pipassessment #intrusivethoughts #anxiety #depression #clinicaldepression

ADVERTISEMENT

OCD Cymru Logo - Domain Name For Sale!
We can write articles on the subject as well as spread awareness.

DWP makes a major change this week to the PIP benefit payment process

August 2, 2023 / EDITOR / 0 Comments
DWP PIP DIGITAL FORMS BANNER

DWP makes a major change this week to the PIP benefit payment process

DWP makes major change this week to PIP benefit payment process (msn.com)

DWP will give people with these 70 conditions up to £172.75 a week – MyLondon

https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/pip-digital-forms/

https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/pip-review-digital-form/

Introduction

In a significant move aimed at improving the welfare system and enhancing the lives of millions of disabled individuals in the UK, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has implemented a major change to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) benefit payment process. This change, which comes into effect this week, represents a positive step towards streamlining the system and providing more timely support to those who need it the most.

The Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Benefit

The PIP is a non-means-tested benefit in the UK designed to assist individuals aged between 16 and state pension age who have long-term health conditions or disabilities that affect their daily living or mobility. PIP aims to provide financial support to help cover the additional costs associated with living with a disability, empowering recipients to lead more independent lives.

Previous Payment Process Challenges

In recent years, the PIP benefit system has faced various challenges, most notably long waiting times and delays in processing claims. These issues have caused significant frustration and hardship for applicants, often leaving them in financial distress while awaiting their assessments and payment approvals.

Moreover, the complex and time-consuming assessment process created a burden on both the applicants and the system itself, leading to a backlog of cases that hindered the efficient distribution of much-needed support.

The Major Change

The DWP’s recent major change to the PIP benefit payment process revolves around expediting the assessment and payment timeline. With the implementation of new technologies and digital solutions, the DWP aims to reduce the waiting time for applicants and streamline the overall process.

One of the key components of this change is the introduction of an advanced digital application platform. This user-friendly system enables applicants to submit their claims online, thereby eliminating the need for paper-based applications and reducing the possibility of manual errors. The digital platform also offers real-time updates and notifications, keeping applicants informed about the status of their claims throughout the process.

Additionally, the DWP has invested in the recruitment and training of more qualified assessors to accelerate the assessment process. By increasing the number of professionals handling the evaluations, the department aims to reduce the backlog of claims and ensure that individuals with disabilities receive their deserved support promptly.

Impact on Recipients

The changes implemented by the DWP have the potential to transform the lives of disabled individuals across the country. By streamlining the application process and shortening the waiting time for assessments, claimants will now experience quicker access to financial support, providing a sense of stability and relief during times of uncertainty.

Furthermore, the digitalization of the application process will make it easier for individuals to apply and manage their claims, reducing administrative complexities and improving overall user experience.

The Future Outlook

As the DWP rolls out these changes, it will be crucial to monitor their effectiveness and gather feedback from recipients to identify any potential areas for improvement. The department should remain committed to refining the system and addressing any emerging challenges promptly.

Final Thoughts From The Editor

My concerns are if the mentally disabled do not get support from their GPs and their illnesses are not updated how will PIP know if someone’s health has deteriorated?

I would like to think that one of my previous articles acknowledged the fact that going digital saves the government money and the ecosystem’s carbon footprints.

PIP should also have a support email address and that way everything is logged.

The recent major change to the PIP benefit payment process by the Department for Work and Pensions marks a significant step towards enhancing the welfare system in the UK. By focusing on streamlining the application and assessment process, the DWP aims to provide timely support to disabled individuals and improve their overall quality of life. As the changes take effect this week, it is hoped that they will bring about positive outcomes for the recipients and reduce the waiting times, which in turn will reduce stress and help improve mental health.

ADVERTISEMENT

GPAI BANNER AD

#pip #personalindependencepayments #dwp #departmentforworkandpensions #disabilityallowance #mobility #mobilityallowance #disabilities #disabled

Anxiety: Understanding and Coping with a Common Emotional Disorder

February 12, 2023 / Zena Maziak / 0 Comments

Anxiety: Understanding and Coping with a Common Emotional Disorder

Anxiety is a common emotional disorder that affects millions of people around the world.

It is characterized by feelings of worry, nervousness, and fear, and it can have a significant impact on an individual’s quality of life. Despite its prevalence, many people still do not understand what anxiety is, how it develops, and how it can be treated.

What is Anxiety?

Anxiety is a normal response to stress and danger. It prepares us to face a challenge or respond to an emergency by increasing our heart rate, sweating, and tensing our muscles. However, anxiety becomes a problem when it interferes with our daily activities and causes significant distress.

There are several types of anxiety disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobias. Each type of anxiety disorder has unique symptoms, but all share the common theme of excessive, persistent worry and fear.

What Causes Anxiety?

The exact cause of anxiety is not well understood, but it is thought to be a combination of genetic, environmental, and psychological factors. People with a family history of anxiety are more likely to develop the disorder, and traumatic life events, such as abuse, neglect, or loss, can trigger anxiety symptoms. Additionally, chronic stress, substance abuse, and certain medical conditions can also contribute to the development of anxiety.

How to Manage Anxiety

Fortunately, anxiety is a treatable condition, and there are several effective strategies for managing its symptoms. Some of the most commonly used strategies include:

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT): CBT is a type of therapy that helps individuals understand and change negative thoughts and behaviors that contribute to anxiety.
  • Medication: Antidepressant and anti-anxiety medications, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and benzodiazepines, can be effective in reducing anxiety symptoms.
  • Exercise: Regular exercise has been shown to have a positive impact on anxiety by reducing stress and improving mood.
  • Relaxation techniques: Techniques such as deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, and mindfulness can help reduce physical symptoms of anxiety and promote a sense of calm.
  • Lifestyle changes: Simple lifestyle changes, such as getting enough sleep, eating a healthy diet, and reducing caffeine and alcohol consumption, can also help reduce anxiety symptoms.

How Anxiety Affects Me

From a personal perspective anxiety comes and goes. It is the fear of the unknown that can spiral into stress, panic attacks, depression, and procrastination. For example, bearing in mind it is a Sunday so you would not expect any businesses to call you today, yet I noticed a missed call. Not knowing who it was that was calling me, I withheld my number and proceeded to call the number back and I was put through to the DWP.

Update Monday 13th February 2023. I had another missed call today and this time they left a message that they will phone me between 11 -12 despite me telling the PIP assessor I am in University Mon, Tue & Fri. I did accept the call when they rang and they said they are increasing my PIP payments as they needed some more information about my mobility. So it looks like they work Sundays as well.

Stress & Anxiety impact on a sufferer of multiple sclerosis.

Considering I have voice mail activated you would think the person that was trying to reach me would leave a message, but unfortunately, they didn’t which has now made me feel anxious and on edge. Stress and anxiety can cause a person suffering from multiple sclerosis to relapse. Relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) | Multiple Sclerosis Society UK (mssociety.org.uk)

Fortunately, I have my mum as my rock and she tried reassuring me that they will write to you if they cannot get in touch and that I needn’t worry as she will take care of things for me.

Conclusion

Anxiety is a common and treatable emotional disorder through medication, CBT therapy, and hypnosis. It can have a significant impact on an individual’s quality of life. By understanding its causes and learning how to manage its symptoms, people with anxiety can take back control of their lives and improve their overall well-being. If you are experiencing symptoms of anxiety, it is important to seek help from a mental health professional who can provide an accurate diagnosis and develop an effective treatment plan.

#ms #msrelapses #dep #pip #persoanlindependancepayments #stress #wory #anxiety #panicattacks #procrastination

PIP Digital Forms

February 8, 2023 / EDITOR / 1 Comment
DWP PIP DIGITAL FORMS BANNER

PIP Digital Forms

I would like to think when I wrote last November the anxiety of filling out a physical PIP assessment form that someone must have read my post considering I have linked Capita and DWP to this site because today I read with delight that digital forms are now being tested out.

The announcement of the new form came through an answer Mr. Pursglove gave when asked if DWP would “make an assessment of the potential merits of introducing an online portal for Personal Independence Payment claims to help improve communication” between DWP and claimants.

It was reported that the NHS wastes £100 million per annum sending out letters, so imagine the letters and the forms combined and how much is going down the pan, where the money can be reinvested into nursing.

The links are below:

NHS ‘wastes £100m a year sending letters’ | News | The Times

DWP issues important update to people seeking to claim personal independence payment (msn.com)

PIP Review Digital Form | DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK

I feel in this day and age when we are supposed to save the planet from carbon emissions and are supposed to be moving forward in the tech era that businesses and organizations should refrain from sending out mail by post. Imagine how many trees could be saved simply by going digital.

This is a positive step moving forward.

People who do not have computers or smartphones, most likely have a relative, friend, or carer that does.

#pip #pipdigital #dwp #dwpdigital #pipdigitalforms #dwpdigitalforms #onlineforms

« Older posts

disabledentrepreneur.uk/health-content-writing-service/

Content Writing Service DEJ Banner AD.
Disabled Entrepreneur Logo

Subscribe Today!


Disability News, Reviews & Services

Advertise Here!

Advertise Here Banner

Calendar

October 2023
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Disabilities Categories

Our Other Sites & Services

www.ukwebsitedesigners.co.uk

www.ukdomainbrokers.com

www.ukcontentwriters.com

www.cymrumarketing.com

www.irenata.com

www.zenasjournal.com

www.renataai.com

© 2023 DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑