DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
Browsing Category
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has recently introduced new rules for Jobcentre interactions, sparking widespread concern among claimants of Universal Credit (UC), Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA), and Personal Independence Payment (PIP). These changes, which aim to streamline processes and increase claimant engagement, have left many feeling anxious about their financial security and the additional burdens imposed by these policies.
Britain has seen a notable rise in the number of individuals claiming long-term sickness benefits, according to the latest data from the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) over 2.5 million people are now classified as economically inactive due to long-term illness, a record high.
In a bold address, Liz Kendall, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, unveiled plans for a comprehensive overhaul of the UK’s Jobcentre system as part of her broader mission to revitalize the labour market and tackle economic inactivity.
Recent discussions surrounding proposed reforms by the UK Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) suggest that people born between 2003 and 2008 may see their Universal Credit (UC) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) entitlements reduced or removed. The reforms aim to push younger individuals into employment, with the DWP targeting those deemed capable of work despite receiving benefits for disability or health conditions. These measures could disproportionately affect young people, raising significant ethical and legal concerns.
The Universal Credit (UC) system, designed to provide financial support for individuals in need, has faced significant criticism for its invasive practices, particularly during home visits. One alarming issue is the potential for personal data, such as bank card details, passport numbers, and other sensitive information, to be shared with agents during these visits. This raises critical questions about data protection, legal compliance, and individual rights.
The UC Commitment Agreement’s “one-size-fits-all” approach fails to consider the unique circumstances of claimants who are carers, students, and entrepreneurs. By disregarding their need for accommodations and imposing excessive demands, UC risks pushing these individuals to the brink, both financially and emotionally.
For self-employed individuals, Universal Credit and other benefits usually consider profit (after expenses) as income. However, classifying profit as income can have a negative impact on a business.
Universal Credit, intended to streamline welfare support, has become a source of severe emotional distress for many, especially those with mental health conditions, disabilities, or those juggling multiple responsibilities like caring, self-employment, and education. The system’s requirements often push claimants into situations that worsen their mental health, with frequent threats of sanctions and unrealistic task demands creating a cycle of anxiety and fear.
Governments sometimes employ coercive measures to ensure that citizens are actively seeking work, increasing their working hours, or attending mandatory appointments—sometimes without considering an individual’s personal circumstances, including disability or self-employment. Such coercion can often infringe on a number of human rights and statutory protections.
Universal Credit should act as a lifeline, not an additional source of stress. For the system to truly support individuals, it must respect their dignity, accommodate disabilities, and employ an empathetic approach to those facing life’s most challenging circumstances.