Freedom of Expression vs Freedom of Harm
Exploring the balance between freedom of expression and public harm — and why stronger legislation, trigger warnings, and editorial standards are urgently needed in media and social platforms.
DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
Browsing Category

Exploring the balance between freedom of expression and public harm — and why stronger legislation, trigger warnings, and editorial standards are urgently needed in media and social platforms.

A detailed guide to corporate harassment law in the UK, including legal definitions under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Equality Act 2010, FOI rights, and whether accusing a journalist of “harassment” for information requests is lawful.

Freedom of expression and freedom of speech are fundamental human rights, recognised under international and domestic law. They empower individuals to voice their opinions, share ideas, and engage in open debate, which is vital for a democratic society. However, these freedoms are not absolute; they come with responsibilities and legal boundaries.

As facial recognition continues to evolve, its deployment must be balanced against privacy laws, GDPR obligations, and fundamental human rights. Without stricter regulations and safeguards, the technology risks eroding the very freedoms it claims to protect.

Inciting racial hatred is one of the most serious offenses under the UK’s hate crime legislation, carrying severe penalties for those found guilty. The law works to balance freedom of speech with the protection of vulnerable communities, acknowledging the devastating impact that hate speech can have on individuals and society as a whole.

Hate crime is a violation of human rights and a crime against the very values of equality, dignity, and respect. It tears communities apart and leaves victims in emotional ruins. Society must come together to condemn hate, strengthen the law, and support victims. Most importantly, we must remember that diversity is our strength, and no one should be made to feel unsafe for simply being who they are.

The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) has announced plans to invite members of the public to deliberate on the salaries of Members of Parliament. In an attempt to increase transparency and trust following the 2010 expenses scandal, IPSA will be sending out 10,000 letters through a lottery system in the coming weeks.

In a significant pivot, the UK government has introduced major concessions to its welfare reform bill, aiming to balance fiscal caution with social justice. The move follows mounting pressure from disability rights advocates, backbench MPs, and public concern about the sweeping changes initially proposed.

Content writing is a powerful tool to inform, inspire, and influence. However, with that power comes a responsibility to write lawfully, ethically, and sensitively. In the age of digital platforms and mass communication, one must understand the boundaries of free speech, the risk of defamation, and how to avoid censorship or legal repercussions, especially when writing about politics, government policies, or controversial topics.