DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
Browsing Category
The Mental Health Investment Standard (MHIS) has served as a critical framework ensuring that health commissioners dedicate proportionate funding to mental health services. Its removal would mark a significant regression in the fight to achieve parity between physical and mental health care. This decision threatens to dismantle years of progress and expose millions of vulnerable individuals to a worsening mental health crisis.
The current reliance on physical letters and the lack of centralized email communication for submitting evidence or inquiries with HMRC and Universal Credit (UC) creates unnecessary stress, especially for disabled individuals.
The welfare cap, a policy designed to limit the total amount of benefits a household can claim, has sparked intense debate regarding its fairness and real-world impact on people living in poverty.
In a bold address, Liz Kendall, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, unveiled plans for a comprehensive overhaul of the UK’s Jobcentre system as part of her broader mission to revitalize the labour market and tackle economic inactivity.
Recent discussions surrounding proposed reforms by the UK Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) suggest that people born between 2003 and 2008 may see their Universal Credit (UC) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) entitlements reduced or removed. The reforms aim to push younger individuals into employment, with the DWP targeting those deemed capable of work despite receiving benefits for disability or health conditions. These measures could disproportionately affect young people, raising significant ethical and legal concerns.
Assuming that a disabled person is capable of performing certain tasks or stepping outside their comfort zone without considering their individual limitations can lead to significant legal breaches. Such assumptions may violate the Equality Act 2010, particularly the duty to make reasonable adjustments, as forcing someone to undertake activities beyond their capacity disregards their health and well-being.
The UC Commitment Agreement’s “one-size-fits-all” approach fails to consider the unique circumstances of claimants who are carers, students, and entrepreneurs. By disregarding their need for accommodations and imposing excessive demands, UC risks pushing these individuals to the brink, both financially and emotionally.
Universal Credit, intended to streamline welfare support, has become a source of severe emotional distress for many, especially those with mental health conditions, disabilities, or those juggling multiple responsibilities like caring, self-employment, and education. The system’s requirements often push claimants into situations that worsen their mental health, with frequent threats of sanctions and unrealistic task demands creating a cycle of anxiety and fear.
Coercion by government agencies, especially when compounded by financial difficulty, can deepen discrimination against individuals with disabilities, forcing them into situations that compromise their rights and well-being.
There has been increased debate around the ethics and legality of healthcare practices, especially concerning the disabled community. A particularly controversial issue is whether it is appropriate to mandate that patients undergo tests, such as blood pressure or blood tests, as a condition for continued medication prescriptions.