DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
Browsing Category
With 80 MPs preparing to revolt, the government must reconsider its approach before history repeats itself. If these policies are implemented, the consequences could be irreversible—not just for disabled claimants, but for the moral integrity of the nation.
The proposed public spending changes could exacerbate issues, potentially driving vulnerable individuals into poverty and undermining their dignity and well-being. Human rights advocates stress that such policies may contravene international human rights standards, particularly those related to social security and an adequate standard of living.
Forcing disabled individuals to undergo repeated, degrading, and inhumane assessments has a domino effect, exacerbating mental health struggles and increasing pressure on the NHS. The stress and anxiety caused by these unnecessary reassessments can lead to worsening health conditions, further reducing an individual’s quality of life while placing additional financial and medical strain on public healthcare services.
The DWP’s actions, including the termination of essential benefits without comprehensive evaluations of individual circumstances, have directly contributed to the suffering and deaths of vulnerable disabled individuals. There is an urgent need for systemic reforms to ensure that the welfare system effectively safeguards and supports those it is designed to help.
The UK government is reportedly considering a significant overhaul of disability benefits, which may involve replacing the current Personal Independence Payment (PIP) system. This proposed change has raised concerns about its potential to override previous tribunal decisions and possibly breach existing laws.
Categorizing individuals with Short Bowel Syndrome as having Limited Capability for Work (LCW) under Universal Credit, implying they may be expected to work in the future, reflects an ableist and medically inaccurate stance. Unlike conditions that can improve over time, Short Bowel Syndrome is a lifelong and progressive disorder that only deteriorates as the body struggles with chronic malabsorption, fatigue, and related complications. To suggest that someone with SBS may one day become fit for work ignores the stark medical reality and places them in unnecessary financial and emotional distress.
If an employer fails to act, you can escalate the issue by seeking advice from ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) or contacting a trade union if you are a member. Additionally, you may consider filing a formal grievance with your employer, and if the situation remains unresolved, you can take your case to an employment tribunal for disability discrimination.
The failure to accommodate employees with disabilities could result in a wave of lawsuits across the country, with disabled workers seeking justice for the discrimination they face. The public outcry will be undeniable as individuals and advocacy groups demand accountability.
The Public Authorities (Fraud, Error & Recovery) Bill’s provisions, as currently proposed, represent a significant shift in the balance between combating fraud and protecting individual rights. While addressing fraudulent claims and recovering funds are legitimate goals, the government must ensure that these measures do not infringe on legal protections or human dignity.
We do NOT encourage dependency on benefits for those who are capable of working. This article is aimed at supporting individuals with genuine illnesses and disabilities to know their rights and navigate a system that often overlooks their needs. To help the government and streamline the process, individuals should provide extensive medical history and reports from doctors, specialists, and other healthcare providers to prove their inability to work.