Labour’s Decision to Drop ‘Fitness for Work’ Test
By engaging in self-employment, gaining new skills, or obtaining a degree, claimants can often avoid constant reassessments and the anxiety of proving their inability to work.
DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
Browsing Category
By engaging in self-employment, gaining new skills, or obtaining a degree, claimants can often avoid constant reassessments and the anxiety of proving their inability to work.
The cost of living crisis in the UK is deepening, with significant implications for child poverty. As inflation rises, wages stagnate, and social support systems struggle to keep pace, many families find themselves unable to meet even basic needs. A distressing consequence of this is the growing number of children going to school hungry, a stark indicator of the increasing financial pressures on households across the country.
The Government’s consideration of changes to the WCA is a promising step towards a more compassionate and effective welfare system. By addressing the shortcomings of the current system and adopting a more individualized approach, the new assessment process could better support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions.

Many vulnerable groups, including the disabled, disabled entrepreneurs, students, carers, and those nearing retirement age, have faced significant challenges in the migration process, leading to widespread hardship and frustration.
The transition from Working Tax Credits to Universal Credit in the UK brings new challenges for self-employed individuals. The introduction of the Minimum Income Floor can create pressure to increase earnings, which may be difficult due to market conditions, caregiving responsibilities, or part-time education.
The DWP’s silence on the matter of Prime Minister Sunak’s claims about PIP exploitation, juxtaposed with the new data showing zero percent fraud, highlights a significant issue in the communication and management of welfare programs.
The upcoming inquiry into the DWP’s treatment of ill and disabled benefit claimants marks a critical juncture in addressing long-standing concerns about the welfare system’s fairness and compassion. As the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) takes decisive action to investigate potential violations of equality law, there is hope for substantial reforms that will protect and support the most vulnerable members of society.
As the government deliberates on the best course of action, PIP claimants are left in a state of uncertainty. The potential cuts to PIP payments underscore a broader tension between fiscal responsibility and social support. Balancing these competing priorities will be crucial in shaping the future of the UK’s welfare system and ensuring that it can effectively serve those who depend on it. Stakeholders, including claimants, advocacy groups, and policymakers, must engage in constructive dialogue to find solutions that safeguard both the financial health of the system and the well-being of its beneficiaries.
Determining when an illness is considered a disability involves a complex interplay of legal definitions, medical evaluations, and practical implications. Chronic and severe illnesses that significantly impair daily activities and work capabilities are more likely to be recognized as disabilities. Understanding this distinction is essential for providing appropriate support and ensuring the rights and well-being of individuals affected by such conditions.
There is growing debate surrounding the recognition of depression as a disability, particularly within the context of government policies and support systems. Despite its profound impact on individuals’ lives, depression is often overlooked or downplayed as a legitimate disability by certain governmental bodies. This stance has significant implications for those living with depression, including issues of disability discrimination, marginalization, and violations of human rights.