DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
Browsing Category
Civil law governs disputes between individuals or organizations, aiming to resolve issues like contracts, property, and family matters through compensation or court orders. Tort law is a branch of civil law that deals specifically with wrongful acts, such as negligence or defamation, where one party causes harm to another, and the injured party can seek damages.
Balancing Security, Privacy, and Accessibility in the UK’s New Digital ID System In September 2025, the UK government announced a plan to introduce a mandatory digital ID for citizens and …
The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 has been replaced by the Equality Act 2010, but its spirit lives on. The Equality Act not only carried forward the protections of the DDA but also expanded them, creating a more comprehensive framework for tackling discrimination. For disabled people, this means their rights are now protected under a single, stronger piece of legislation, but ensuring those rights are respected still requires continued advocacy, awareness, and enforcement.
Police powers are vital for maintaining law and order, but they must always be balanced with civil liberties and human rights. Vulnerable groups, particularly minors and disabled individuals, require additional safeguards to prevent abuse or discrimination. Understanding your rights under PACE, questioning the use of stop and search, and knowing the complaint procedures are essential tools for seeking justice when things go wrong.
“Enforced disappearance is not only a serious crime under international law but also a mental health emergency. Victims and families face wounds that are invisible, prolonged, and often overlooked. As Professor Forrester and Dr Ahmed emphasise, there is a ‘dire need’ to recognise these harms and provide effective, compassionate, and culturally sensitive care.”
The Union Jack controversy highlights a deep divide between patriotism and humanitarian duty. British citizens should feel free to be proud of their heritage, while migrants should not be dehumanised. Ultimately, ‘ALL HUMANS DESERVE DIGNITY’ and the protection of their basic rights, regardless of citizenship. The real path forward lies not in pitting communities against each other, but in finding fair, practical solutions that honour both national sovereignty and universal human rights.
Freedom of expression and freedom of speech are fundamental human rights, recognised under international and domestic law. They empower individuals to voice their opinions, share ideas, and engage in open debate, which is vital for a democratic society. However, these freedoms are not absolute; they come with responsibilities and legal boundaries.
The UK government’s move to abolish the Human Rights Act and potentially leave the ECHR could leave citizens with no enforceable rights. What would this mean for the public, migrants, and democracy?
As facial recognition continues to evolve, its deployment must be balanced against privacy laws, GDPR obligations, and fundamental human rights. Without stricter regulations and safeguards, the technology risks eroding the very freedoms it claims to protect.
Britain’s strength has always been in its diversity and resilience. Those of us born here, regardless of our heritage or the sound of our names, are as much a part of this country as anyone else. Not all foreigners should be put in the same category. Our policies and attitudes should focus on real issues, such as illegal immigration, while protecting the dignity, safety, and rights of British citizens of all backgrounds.