DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
DISABLED ENTREPRENEUR – DISABILITY UK
Disability UK Online Health Journal – All In One Business In A Box – Forum – Business Directory – Useful Resources – Health – Human Rights – Politics
Browsing Category
As the government struggles with mounting pressures on the public purse, it must confront a harsh reality: many people living with disabilities and long-term illnesses are being driven to despair by poverty, exacerbated by the rising cost of living.
Crossing international borders can be an anxiety-inducing experience for anyone. For individuals with disabilities, however, the process often escalates into a distressing ordeal that infringes upon dignity, induces humiliation, and highlights systemic inequities. Across the globe, people with visible and invisible disabilities encounter discriminatory practices, racism, and unwarranted assumptions at border controls, transforming an already challenging process into a deeply degrading experience.
In a shocking development, Rachel Reeves, the UK Shadow Chancellor, is reportedly preparing to cut billions of pounds from disability benefits in an attempt to address the country’s mounting debt crisis. This move, if implemented, would have devastating consequences for disabled individuals and raise serious questions about the morality and legality of such a policy.
The government must ensure that any changes to the PIP system are fair, evidence-based, and designed to support, not hinder, the lives of disabled individuals. Moving forward, transparency, accountability, and a commitment to equality will be the cornerstones of a system that truly serves those in need.
Mental health conditions significantly elevate the risk of suicidal ideation. Studies reveal that individuals suffering from mental health disorders are disproportionately affected, with nearly 90% of those who die by suicide having a diagnosable mental health condition at the time of their death. In the UK, this alarming reality intersects with socio-economic pressures, such as financial sanctions imposed by Universal Credit, which may exacerbate feelings of hopelessness and desperation for those already struggling with their mental health.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has recently introduced new rules for Jobcentre interactions, sparking widespread concern among claimants of Universal Credit (UC), Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA), and Personal Independence Payment (PIP). These changes, which aim to streamline processes and increase claimant engagement, have left many feeling anxious about their financial security and the additional burdens imposed by these policies.
The welfare cap, a policy designed to limit the total amount of benefits a household can claim, has sparked intense debate regarding its fairness and real-world impact on people living in poverty.
The UC Commitment Agreement’s “one-size-fits-all” approach fails to consider the unique circumstances of claimants who are carers, students, and entrepreneurs. By disregarding their need for accommodations and imposing excessive demands, UC risks pushing these individuals to the brink, both financially and emotionally.
Universal Credit, intended to streamline welfare support, has become a source of severe emotional distress for many, especially those with mental health conditions, disabilities, or those juggling multiple responsibilities like caring, self-employment, and education. The system’s requirements often push claimants into situations that worsen their mental health, with frequent threats of sanctions and unrealistic task demands creating a cycle of anxiety and fear.
Governments sometimes employ coercive measures to ensure that citizens are actively seeking work, increasing their working hours, or attending mandatory appointments—sometimes without considering an individual’s personal circumstances, including disability or self-employment. Such coercion can often infringe on a number of human rights and statutory protections.