Browsing Category

Working & Disabilities

Showing 145 Result(s)
Image Description: Brown & Cream Coloured Image Depicting a Typewriter With Wording "Invisible Disabilities" Typed On Paper. Image Credit: PhotoFunia.com Category: Vintage Typewriter.

Understanding Invisible Disabilities, Recognizing the Unseen Challenges

The government’s proposed benefit reforms are not just a bureaucratic shift—they are a direct attack on the dignity, autonomy, and survival of disabled people. By making it harder to claim PIP and coercing individuals into unsuitable work, these policies will lead to a national crisis, affecting not just the disabled community but the economy, healthcare system, and society as a whole. It is time for disabled individuals, advocacy groups, and legal professionals to unite and challenge these injustices before they become irreversible.

AI Bot

The Transformative Impact of AI On Disabled Entrepreneurs

The fear that AI could be a competitor arises from concerns about job displacement, reduced creativity, and economic disruption. However, AI’s true potential lies in being a co-creator, enabling individuals, including disabled entrepreneurs, to leverage its capabilities to enhance and accelerate their work, while still maintaining the human touch in decision-making, creativity, and empathy.

Justice Image

Disabled Face Devastating Cuts-A Human Rights Perspective

The proposed public spending changes could exacerbate issues, potentially driving vulnerable individuals into poverty and undermining their dignity and well-being. Human rights advocates stress that such policies may contravene international human rights standards, particularly those related to social security and an adequate standard of living.

PIP Eligibility Text on Typewriter Paper. Image Credit: PhotoFunia.com

DWP Responds to Calls for Overhaul of ‘Interrogation-Like’ PIP Assessments Amid Growing Public Backlash

The petition, backed by thousands of claimants and disability rights advocates, highlights the distress and anxiety caused by repeated assessments, which force individuals to continually prove their disabilities. Critics argue that the process is excessively intrusive, often disregarding medical evidence and placing undue pressure on those already struggling with long-term health conditions.