Brown and Cream Image Of a Typewriter With The Wording Disability Discrimination Text On Typed On Typewriter Paper. Image Credit: PhotoFunia.com Category Vintage Typewriter
Image Description: Brown and Cream Image Of a Typewriter With The Wording Disability Discrimination Text On Typed On Typewriter Paper. Image Credit: PhotoFunia.com Category: Vintage Typewriter


“Disability Discrimination in Healthcare: The Impact of Failing to Accommodate OCD and Communication Needs”

GP surgery and doctors might be in breach of obligations under the Equality Act 2010 in the UK, which protects individuals from discrimination based on protected characteristics, including disabilities. Since obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) significantly affects the ability to leave the house due to germ contamination, the surgery has a duty to make reasonable adjustments to accommodate your condition.

Discrimination and Breach of Duty:

  1. Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments:
    • If the surgery is aware of your condition and the difficulty you face in attending in person, they may be in breach of their duty to make reasonable adjustments. Reasonable adjustments could include offering alternative ways to measure your blood pressure, such as sending a home-monitoring kit, using telemedicine, or allowing a home visit.
    • Not providing these adjustments could be considered disability discrimination by failing to accommodate a known disability.
  2. Indirect Discrimination:
    • If a policy, such as requiring all patients to come in person for blood pressure checks, disproportionately disadvantages people with disabilities like OCD, it could amount to indirect discrimination, unless the surgery can justify that this policy is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (for example, ensuring accurate medical assessments).
  3. Lack of Communication Flexibility:
    • If the surgery is insisting on calling you without scheduling and providing a specific time, this could also be considered a failure to accommodate your specific needs. If they know that you prefer to schedule calls or communicate in a different way (such as by email or written correspondence), and they refuse to make that adjustment, it could again be seen as a breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments.
  4. Unfair Assumption Regarding Flexibility:
    • Expecting you to be available at an undefined time for their call can indeed be seen as unreasonable, particularly if you have communicated your need to manage your time around your business and studies. It may be unfair for them to assume that you will simply drop everything without notice, especially given that you are running a business and have other obligations.

Possible Actions:

  • Raise the issue: You could raise your concerns with the surgery, explaining how their current practices are impacting you and how they can better accommodate your needs.
  • Request adjustments: Ask for reasonable adjustments, such as scheduled calls, alternative communication methods, or a home-based alternative for blood pressure monitoring.
  • Formal Complaint: If your requests are ignored, you can make a formal complaint to the surgery, and if necessary, escalate it to the relevant ombudsman or regulatory body (such as the Care Quality Commission or the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman).

Conclusion

It is entirely reasonable for you to expect flexibility and accommodation from healthcare providers when you have communicated your specific needs, particularly when you have a disability that is affecting your daily life.

It is generally unlawful to force someone to come into a GP surgery for a blood pressure test or any medical examination against their will. In the UK, patients have the right to make autonomous decisions regarding their healthcare, including the right to refuse treatment, under the principles of informed consent and bodily autonomy. Forcing someone into a medical procedure without their consent could violate their human rights under the Human Rights Act 1998, which protects the right to respect for private life (Article 8). Exceptions may apply if the person lacks mental capacity, in which case the Mental Capacity Act 2005 allows for decisions to be made in their best interest, but this still requires careful legal and ethical consideration.


Sources:



Andrew Jones Journalist
+ posts

Andrew Jones is a seasoned journalist renowned for his expertise in current affairs, politics, economics and health reporting. With a career spanning over two decades, he has established himself as a trusted voice in the field, providing insightful analysis and thought-provoking commentary on some of the most pressing issues of our time.

Spread the love