Scrapping Human Rights In The UK

---

🔊 Listen to Post

---

Scrapping Human Rights Of The British Public – Tom Tugendhat MP and the Controversy Over Leaving the European Court of Human Rights

Tom Tugendhat, a prominent Member of Parliament in the UK, has sparked significant debate and concern with his recent proposal to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Tugendhat argues that the ECHR’s decisions often conflict with the UK’s national interests and sovereignty. However, this move has raised alarms among human rights advocates and legal experts who warn of serious implications for the rights and freedoms of British citizens.

Understanding the European Court of Human Rights

The ECHR, established in 1959, oversees the European Convention on Human Rights and aims to protect the human rights and fundamental freedoms of individuals in member states. The Court ensures that signatory countries uphold these rights, providing a crucial check on national governments.

Tugendhat’s Proposal and Its Rationale

Tom Tugendhat’s proposition is rooted in a belief that the ECHR unduly interferes with UK law and governance. Critics of the ECHR often cite cases where the Court’s rulings have overturned decisions made by UK courts, arguing that such interventions undermine the UK’s legal sovereignty and its ability to manage its own affairs.

Potential Implications for UK Citizens

1. Erosion of Fundamental Rights: Leaving the ECHR could lead to the dilution or removal of certain protections currently guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights. Rights to a fair trial, freedom from torture, and the right to privacy could be jeopardized.
2. Weakening of Judicial Oversight: The ECHR acts as a higher authority that can hold the UK government accountable for human rights violations. Without this oversight, there may be fewer checks on government power, potentially leading to abuses.
3. International Repercussions: The UK’s exit from the ECHR might tarnish its international reputation as a defender of human rights. This could affect its diplomatic relations and influence in international bodies.
4. Impact on Domestic Law: The Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporates the European Convention into UK law, could be significantly altered or repealed. This act currently allows UK courts to apply the principles of the ECHR directly in domestic cases, providing a crucial legal tool for protecting citizens’ rights.

How UK Citizens Can Fight for Their Rights

1. Public Advocacy and Protest: Citizens can engage in public advocacy, rallies, and protests to voice their opposition to withdrawing from the ECHR. Mass mobilization can put pressure on politicians and raise awareness about the potential consequences.
2. Legal Challenges: Lawyers and human rights organizations can challenge the government’s decisions through the UK courts. They can argue that withdrawal from the ECHR violates existing constitutional principles or other legal frameworks.
3. Political Action: Voting for representatives who support human rights and the ECHR in future elections is crucial. Citizens can also lobby their MPs, urging them to oppose any measures that would undermine human rights protections.
4. Alliances with NGOs: Collaborating with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) focused on human rights can amplify efforts. These organizations often have the expertise, resources, and platforms to effectively challenge governmental actions.
5. International Support: Engaging with international human rights bodies and leveraging global support can apply external pressure on the UK government. This approach can help highlight the broader implications of withdrawing from the ECHR and garner international condemnation.

Tom Tugendhat MP’s Proposal to Leave the ECHR: A Bid to Control the Population Amidst Ongoing DWP Investigations

Tom Tugendhat, a prominent Member of Parliament in the UK, has sparked significant debate and concern with his recent proposal to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

Context: DWP Investigations and Alleged Human Rights Breaches

This proposal comes at a time when the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is already under investigation for breaching ECHR laws. The DWP has faced accusations of violating human rights, particularly concerning the treatment of disabled individuals and the implementation of welfare policies. Critics argue that withdrawing from the ECHR could be a strategic move to evade accountability and control the population by limiting avenues for redress against government actions.

Understanding the European Court of Human Rights

The ECHR, established in 1959, oversees the European Convention on Human Rights and aims to protect the human rights and fundamental freedoms of individuals in member states. The Court ensures that signatory countries uphold these rights, providing a crucial check on national governments.

Potential Implications for UK Citizens

1. Erosion of Fundamental Rights: Leaving the ECHR could lead to the dilution or removal of certain protections currently guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights. Rights to a fair trial, freedom from torture, and the right to privacy could be jeopardized.
2. Weakening of Judicial Oversight: The ECHR acts as a higher authority that can hold the UK government accountable for human rights violations. Without this oversight, there may be fewer checks on government power, potentially leading to abuses.
3. International Repercussions: The UK’s exit from the ECHR might tarnish its international reputation as a defender of human rights. This could affect its diplomatic relations and influence in international bodies.
4. Impact on Domestic Law: The Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporates the European Convention into UK law, could be significantly altered or repealed. This act currently allows UK courts to apply the principles of the ECHR directly in domestic cases, providing a crucial legal tool for protecting citizens’ rights.

UK Departure from the ECHR: Can a Dual-Nationality Solicitor Advocate for Citizens’ Rights?

The UK’s potential departure from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has stirred considerable debate. Amidst the concerns over eroding fundamental rights and diminishing judicial oversight, a pressing question arises: Can solicitors with dual nationality, such as UK and EU citizenship, act on behalf of UK citizens to safeguard their rights?

Dual-Nationality Solicitors: A Potential Solution

Role of a Dual-Nationality Solicitor: A solicitor with dual nationality (UK and EU Country, for example) could leverage their unique position to act on behalf of UK citizens in several ways:

1. Access to ECHR via Their Country Nationality: As a citizen of a country still bound by the ECHR, the solicitor could potentially bring cases before the ECHR using their EU nationality. This would allow them to challenge UK government actions that violate human rights, provided they can establish a connection to the country in the cases they present.
2. EU Legal Frameworks: As an EU member state, remains under the jurisdiction of the ECHR. The solicitor could use EU legal frameworks to argue cases involving UK citizens, especially those residing in or connected to EU countries.
3. International Advocacy: The solicitor could work with international human rights organizations and bodies to advocate for the rights of UK citizens, highlighting abuses and seeking international pressure on the UK government.
4. Collaborative Efforts: Partnering with UK-based human rights organizations and legal experts, the dual-nationality solicitor could form alliances to mount legal challenges and advocacy campaigns.

Practical Steps for Citizens

Public Advocacy and Protest: Citizens should continue to engage in public advocacy, rallies, and protests to voice their opposition to withdrawing from the ECHR. Mass mobilization can put pressure on politicians and raise awareness about the potential consequences.

Legal Challenges: Leveraging the expertise of dual-nationality solicitors, citizens can challenge the government’s decisions through the UK courts and potentially the ECHR, if a connection to the dual-national country can be established.

Political Action: Voting for representatives who support human rights and the ECHR in future elections is crucial. Citizens can also lobby their MPs, urging them to oppose any measures that would undermine human rights protections.

Alliances with NGOs: Collaborating with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) focused on human rights can amplify efforts. These organizations often have the expertise, resources, and platforms to effectively challenge governmental actions.

International Support: Engaging with international human rights bodies and leveraging global support can apply external pressure on the UK government. This approach can help highlight the broader implications of withdrawing from the ECHR and garner international condemnation.

Human Rights Shouldn’t Be Sacrificed for Border Control

The article titled “Nigel Farage is dead right – why the hell are we still a member of ECHR?” by Carole Malone, recently published on MSN, argues for the UK’s withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Malone and Farage assert that staying in the ECHR hampers the UK’s ability to manage its borders and control immigration. However, such arguments are dangerously misleading and oversimplify a complex issue. It is crucial to recognize that human rights should never be sacrificed in the name of border control. Furthermore, many migrants and refugees are fleeing wars and conflicts, circumstances beyond their control, and stripping them of their rights is both unethical and inhumane.

The Importance of Human Rights

The ECHR is a vital framework that ensures the protection of basic human rights and freedoms. This includes the right to life, freedom from torture, and the right to a fair trial, among others. These rights apply to everyone, irrespective of nationality or immigration status. Suggesting that the UK should abandon this framework implies a readiness to undermine these fundamental protections for the sake of tighter border control, a stance that can have dangerous implications for the rule of law and human dignity.

The Real Causes of Migration

It is essential to understand why people migrate, especially those arriving by boats from conflict zones. Many are fleeing wars, persecution, and extreme poverty. These individuals do not undertake perilous journeys lightly. Wars and conflicts, often exacerbated by geopolitical interests, displace people from their homes, forcing them to seek safety and a better life elsewhere. Blaming the migrants or the framework that protects their rights ignores these root causes and the human suffering involved.

Human Rights for All

Human rights are universal and inalienable. This means that they belong to every human being, regardless of their status as citizens or immigrants. The suggestion to exit the ECHR as a means to control immigration negates the very essence of these rights. By targeting immigrants and refugees, the argument posited by Malone and Farage dehumanizes a vulnerable population and ignores the UK’s moral and legal obligations.

Ethical and Humane Responses

Instead of demonizing immigrants and pushing for policies that erode human rights, the UK should focus on addressing the root causes of migration. This involves playing a constructive role in international diplomacy to resolve conflicts and supporting economic development in war-torn and impoverished regions. Additionally, the UK should uphold its commitment to international human rights standards, providing protection and support to those in need.

The arguments presented in Carole Malone’s article, and endorsed by Nigel Farage, are fundamentally flawed and mislead the public about the importance of human rights. The ECHR is a crucial safeguard that protects the basic rights of all individuals, including migrants and refugees. Abandoning these protections in the name of border control not only undermines these rights but also disregards the complex realities that drive people to seek asylum. The UK must strive to uphold human dignity and rights for all, recognizing that true security and prosperity come from respecting and protecting the humanity of every individual. ‘Nigel Farage is dead right – why the hell are we still a member of ECHR?’ – Carole Malone (msn.com)

Conclusion

The UK’s potential withdrawal from the ECHR poses significant risks to the protection of human rights. However, solicitors with dual nationality, such as UK and EU citizenship, can play a critical role in advocating for UK citizens’ rights. By leveraging their unique legal standing, they can bring cases before the ECHR, engage in international advocacy, and collaborate with domestic and international human rights organizations. This multifaceted approach can help mitigate the adverse effects of the UK leaving the ECHR and ensure that the fundamental rights of UK citizens are upheld.

Tom Tugendhat’s proposal to leave the European Court of Human Rights is a contentious issue that poses significant risks to the protection of human rights in the UK.

“It is essential for citizens, legal experts, and human rights advocates to mobilize and utilize all available means to protect and uphold the fundamental freedoms currently safeguarded by the ECHR. The future of the UK’s commitment to human rights hangs in the balance, and the actions taken now will have lasting impacts for generations to come”.

---

Further Reading:

• Homepage | EHRC (equalityhumanrights.com)
• Equality and Human Rights Commission – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
• Tom Tugendhat says he would be willing to take Britain out of the ECHR in right-wing pitch (msn.com)
• Tom Tugendhat and Robert Jenrick join Tory leadership race as new leader urged to win back Reform voters – live (msn.com)
• https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/dwp-under-investigation/
• https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/pip-claimants-may-lose-737-payments/
• https://disabledentrepreneur.uk/?s=pip
• ‘Nigel Farage is dead right – why the hell are we still a member of ECHR?’ – Carole Malone (msn.com)

---